11th International Conference on Electrical Power Quality and Utilisation 2011
DOI: 10.1109/epqu.2011.6128821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A controlled switching methodology for transformer inrush current elimination: Theory and experimental validation

Abstract: Transformers are generally energized by closing the circuit breakers at random times. Consequently, this operation generates high transient inrush currents as a result of the asymmetrical magnetic flux produced in the windings. In light of these facts, this paper presents a strategy to control the switching phenomena which occurs during power transformer inrush. The general idea consists of calculating the pre-existing magnetic fluxes left on the core limbs as a function of operating voltage previously applied… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly in high voltage scenarios, the deliberate activation of circuit breakers featuring independent pole operation effectively minimizes inrush currents to an insignificant scale, thus eliminating voltage fluctuations within the grid. Similarly, in medium voltage applications, the utilization of controlled switching technology, (10) featuring simultaneous pole operation in switchgear, yields optimal mitigation of inrush currents. Although the presence of considerable residual flux within the core amplifies the inrush current observed during random energization of power transformers, the application of Controlled Switching Device (CSD) technology produces a contrary outcome.…”
Section: Strategy Of Inrush Current Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly in high voltage scenarios, the deliberate activation of circuit breakers featuring independent pole operation effectively minimizes inrush currents to an insignificant scale, thus eliminating voltage fluctuations within the grid. Similarly, in medium voltage applications, the utilization of controlled switching technology, (10) featuring simultaneous pole operation in switchgear, yields optimal mitigation of inrush currents. Although the presence of considerable residual flux within the core amplifies the inrush current observed during random energization of power transformers, the application of Controlled Switching Device (CSD) technology produces a contrary outcome.…”
Section: Strategy Of Inrush Current Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of the inrush current value is influenced by various things, one of which is the ignition angle. The magnitude value of the inrush current will be the maximum value when energized with the ignition angle of 0 degrees, 136 and will be the minimum value when energized with the ignition angle of 90 degrees [9].…”
Section: Inrush Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several solutions external to the toroidal transformers had been proposed for inrush current mitigation such as; use of Negative Temperature Coefficient (NTC) thermistors in primary winding [6], pre-insertion resistors [7], and controlled switching [8]- [10], but all of them will increase the complexity of the system whilst reducing the reliability. Therefore, the robust transformer based solutions are always desirable in the industry [2].…”
Section: Engineermentioning
confidence: 99%