1998
DOI: 10.1205/026387698525702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled Production of Emulsions Using a Crossflow Membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
94
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several single-drop technologies have been developed for generating uniform droplets, such as injection of liquid through a capillary into another co-flowing immiscible fluid [3,4], penetration of dispersed phase through microfabricated parallel silicon channels [5] or interconnected channel network in microfluidic devices [6,7], and injection of dispersed phase through microporous membranes of different nature (glass, ceramic, metallic, polymeric) [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Production of various particulate products, such as microspheres and microcapsules, using membrane emulsification routes was recently reviewed by Vladisavljević and Williams [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several single-drop technologies have been developed for generating uniform droplets, such as injection of liquid through a capillary into another co-flowing immiscible fluid [3,4], penetration of dispersed phase through microfabricated parallel silicon channels [5] or interconnected channel network in microfluidic devices [6,7], and injection of dispersed phase through microporous membranes of different nature (glass, ceramic, metallic, polymeric) [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Production of various particulate products, such as microspheres and microcapsules, using membrane emulsification routes was recently reviewed by Vladisavljević and Williams [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirement for circulation of the continuous phase along the membrane surface can thus be totally avoided. Compared with cross membrane emulsification methods [2,14] this can be particularly advantageous to the production of coarse emulsions and fragile structured products, in which the droplets and/or particles are subject to breakage during the pump circulation. The dispersed phase passes radially through the porous membrane wall and forms droplets moving into the continuous phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] and was initially investigated exclusively using a Shirasu porous glass (SPG) membrane developed by the same authors [5]. In the meantime, this emulsification technology has been attracting an increasing attention all over the world and as a result, other porous membranes have been also investigated as emulsifying mediums, such as ceramic -Al 2 O 3 and Zr 2 O 3 membranes [6][7][8], silica membranes [9], perforated stainless steel plates [10], polymeric membranes made of different materials such as polypropylene [11], polytetrafluoroethylene [12], and polycarbonate [13], microengineered silicon nitride microsieves [14], etc. However, there are few investigations [6,15] with the objective of comparing the characteristics of ME process using porous membranes of different structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean droplet/channel size ratio of 2.63 was smaller than the mean droplet/pore size ratio of 3.0 found in droplet formation from Shirasu Porous Glass (SPG) membrane within the same range of SDS concentration [32], but similar to the mean droplet/pore size ratios in membrane emulsification using asymmetric aluminium oxide membranes [33,34]. The d 3,2 value of 26.3 m is significantly smaller than the average droplet diameter of 39.1 m reported in straight-through MC emulsification for the system containing 1 wt% SDS and soybean oil using a symmetric MC plate with 10  50 m channels [25].…”
Section: Effect Of Emulsifier Content In Continuous Aqueous Phasementioning
confidence: 52%