2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2003.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production of O/W emulsions using SPG membranes, ceramic α-aluminium oxide membranes, microfluidizer and a silicon microchannel plate—a comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of rotational speed on the mean droplet size found here is similar to the effect of cross flow velocity in cross flow membrane emulsification [10]. However, it is especially important to note that the droplet/pore size ratio for the given stainless steel membrane is much smaller than for the Shirasu porous glass (SPG) and ceramic membranes investigated by Vladisavljević et al [10].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of rotational speed on the mean droplet size found here is similar to the effect of cross flow velocity in cross flow membrane emulsification [10]. However, it is especially important to note that the droplet/pore size ratio for the given stainless steel membrane is much smaller than for the Shirasu porous glass (SPG) and ceramic membranes investigated by Vladisavljević et al [10].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Several single-drop technologies have been developed for generating uniform droplets, such as injection of liquid through a capillary into another co-flowing immiscible fluid [3,4], penetration of dispersed phase through microfabricated parallel silicon channels [5] or interconnected channel network in microfluidic devices [6,7], and injection of dispersed phase through microporous membranes of different nature (glass, ceramic, metallic, polymeric) [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Production of various particulate products, such as microspheres and microcapsules, using membrane emulsification routes was recently reviewed by Vladisavljević and Williams [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is an irregular array of pores where the pore openings are randomly spaced on the membrane surface. Studies using the SPG membrane have suggested that the surface utilisation of this type of membrane may be as low as 1%, but with increasing injection rate this utilisation increases [15]. The low utilisation of the membrane surface area is due to the irregular and tortuous pore channels in this type of membrane, whereas the regular array type of membrane illustrated in Figure 1 has very uniform pores and pore channel depth.…”
Section: Dispersed Drop Size Modellingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…At increasing injection rate, more and more pores will pass injected liquid [15] and the push-off force becomes significant. Hence, the size of the drops becomes defined by the push-off force and, possibly, the buoyancy force.…”
Section: Injection Rate Dependencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean droplet/channel size ratio of 2.63 was smaller than the mean droplet/pore size ratio of 3.0 found in droplet formation from Shirasu Porous Glass (SPG) membrane within the same range of SDS concentration [32], but similar to the mean droplet/pore size ratios in membrane emulsification using asymmetric aluminium oxide membranes [33,34]. The d 3,2 value of 26.3 m is significantly smaller than the average droplet diameter of 39.1 m reported in straight-through MC emulsification for the system containing 1 wt% SDS and soybean oil using a symmetric MC plate with 10  50 m channels [25].…”
Section: Effect Of Emulsifier Content In Continuous Aqueous Phasementioning
confidence: 90%