1972
DOI: 10.1093/ije/1.1.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled Field Trials of Oral Killed Typhoid Vaccines in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Population-based studies have demonstrated a wide variation in the incidence of typhoid fever both globally and within India [2,3,[37][38][39][40][41]. Information on typhoid case fatality rate is also scant, with current estimates based on hospital data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Population-based studies have demonstrated a wide variation in the incidence of typhoid fever both globally and within India [2,3,[37][38][39][40][41]. Information on typhoid case fatality rate is also scant, with current estimates based on hospital data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In India, there have been 6 population-based studies estimating the incidence of typhoid fever in the community [3,[37][38][39][40][41] (Table 2). The three studies led by Chuttani were all vaccine trials, performed in the same urban slum between 1968 and 1974 [37][38][39]; Sinha et al conducted their study in 1995-6 in a different urban slum in Delhi [40].…”
Section: Asia and The Indian Subcontinentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3A and C), indicating a key protective effect of CD8 + T cells during Salmonella infection (Lo et al 1999;Lu et al 1999). These findings suggest that BG vaccines induce a cell-mediated immune response instead of the humoral response induced by the inactivated vaccine (Chuttani et al 1973(Chuttani et al , 1977Chong et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaccination is an effective method to control and prevent salmonellosis (Berndt and Methner 2001). Oral inactivated vaccines have been found to elicit weak protective immunity (Chuttani et al 1977;Chuttani et al 1973), whereas oral attenuated vaccines elicited potent protective immune responses (Levine et al 1987;Wahdan et al 1980). The fundamental difference between these two types of vaccines is that attenuated Salmonella promotes the secretion of the cytokines, interleukin (IL)-12 and interferon-␥ (IFN-␥), thereby inducing a T helper 1 (Th1) response and cell-mediated immunity; this type of immune response is not induced by inactivated Salmonella (Chong et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%