1995
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1995.13.9.2324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled clinical trial of interferon-gamma as postoperative surgical adjuvant therapy for colon cancer.

Abstract: This study effectively rules out any clinically meaningful benefit for IFN-gamma as surgical adjuvant treatment for patients with high-risk colon cancer. Although significant enhancement of nonspecific immune function was seen with this dosage administration schedule of IFN-gamma, this was not associated with any demonstrable antitumor effect.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, IFNg treatment did not result in any difference in the outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinomas (20). No clinically meaningful benefit was observed in a controlled trial testing the use of IFNg as a postoperative surgical adjuvant therapy for colon cancer (21). Furthermore, a phase III trial of IFNg plus carboplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel alone for treating advanced ovarian carcinomas was stopped early due to the significantly shorter overall survival (OS) time of the patients receiving IFNg (22).…”
Section: Inconsistent Clinical Results Regarding the Effects Of Ifngmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In contrast, IFNg treatment did not result in any difference in the outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinomas (20). No clinically meaningful benefit was observed in a controlled trial testing the use of IFNg as a postoperative surgical adjuvant therapy for colon cancer (21). Furthermore, a phase III trial of IFNg plus carboplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel alone for treating advanced ovarian carcinomas was stopped early due to the significantly shorter overall survival (OS) time of the patients receiving IFNg (22).…”
Section: Inconsistent Clinical Results Regarding the Effects Of Ifngmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…12 The role of adjuvant treatment in the therapy of colon carcinoma is an area of intense investigation and there is controversy on the benefit of IFN-gamma treatment. 39 However, several groups reported effectiveness of IFN-gamma against colon carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo. [40][41][42][43] It may be speculated that the correlation of IFN effects and MTAP expression found in vitro in colon carcinoma cells could also have impact on the therapeutically success in vivo and may eventually allow to predict the tumour response to IFN treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are conflicting reports in the surgical literature on the effect of post-operative IFN-γ administration. In patients with colonic cancer IFN-γ appears to increase HLA-DR expression on PBMCs, 29 whereas in other patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery IFN-γ administered as part of in vitro experiments failed to reconstitute defective pro-inflammatory cytokine production. 29 Our data demonstrates that the in vitro administration of IFN-γ can reverse features of defective antigen presenting capacity following major surgery in patients both with and without cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In patients with colonic cancer IFN-γ appears to increase HLA-DR expression on PBMCs, 29 whereas in other patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery IFN-γ administered as part of in vitro experiments failed to reconstitute defective pro-inflammatory cytokine production. 29 Our data demonstrates that the in vitro administration of IFN-γ can reverse features of defective antigen presenting capacity following major surgery in patients both with and without cancer. Our use of a wellvalidated, standardized biomarker of immune suppression (mHLA-DR) of particular relevance in the prediction of septic complications enhances the potential clinical applicability of these results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%