2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9gc03896e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled assembly of secondary keratin structures for continuous and scalable production of tough fibers from chicken feathers

Abstract: Continuous production of tough keratin fibers via high recovery of protein secondary structures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By applying this modification on the fibres, the defects of inner fibre surface reduced and the molecular orientation of the polymeric chain of the fibre changed, which ultimately enhanced the fibre mechanical properties of the fibres produced with 25% wool content (WP 25:75). The modified fibre exhibited higher mechanical strength (~ 327 MPa) compared to the other fibres such as feather barbs (~ 161 MPa), keratin fibres (~ 138 MPa), wool fibres (~ 173 MPa), alpaca/PAN composite fibres (~ 297 MPa), and viscose fibres (~ 276 MPa), reported in the literature 28 , 42 . Therefore, this fibre (WP 25:75) with enhanced mechanical properties was further coated with the GO to fabricate the bio-based electrically conductive fibre, which will be discussed in the next section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…By applying this modification on the fibres, the defects of inner fibre surface reduced and the molecular orientation of the polymeric chain of the fibre changed, which ultimately enhanced the fibre mechanical properties of the fibres produced with 25% wool content (WP 25:75). The modified fibre exhibited higher mechanical strength (~ 327 MPa) compared to the other fibres such as feather barbs (~ 161 MPa), keratin fibres (~ 138 MPa), wool fibres (~ 173 MPa), alpaca/PAN composite fibres (~ 297 MPa), and viscose fibres (~ 276 MPa), reported in the literature 28 , 42 . Therefore, this fibre (WP 25:75) with enhanced mechanical properties was further coated with the GO to fabricate the bio-based electrically conductive fibre, which will be discussed in the next section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The main physicochemical methods of keratin treatment are solubilization in organic solvents or ionic liquids, hydrothermal treatment, acid or alkaline hydrolysis, oxidation or reduction in disulfide bridges by the addition of chemicals, and degradation of hydrogen bonds, e.g., by urea [ 23 , 24 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. The choice of the treatment method has a significant impact on the composition of the extracted keratin and keratin hydrolysate and largely depends on the intended future use of the final product [ 30 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. A comparison of various physicochemical treatment methods with their advantages and disadvantages are presented in Table 2 .…”
Section: Conventional Keratin Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the CFs are often landfilled or incinerated as wastes. For the sake of environmental protection, the CF has been used as fiber-reinforced material [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and flame retardant additives. [26][27][28] Besides, the extraction and utilization of high content keratin is also an effective way to turn CFs into treasure.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/mame202100498mentioning
confidence: 99%