2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2018.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controllable Multinary Alloy Electrodeposition for Thin-Film Solar Cell Fabrication: A Case Study of Kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4

Abstract: SummaryElectrodeposition (ED) technology is a low-cost industrial candidate for solar cell fabrication. However, the practical aspects of controlling deposit morphology and composition have not been significantly addressed because of the complex co-plating variables that still need to be understood for multinary alloy ED. This work addresses these practical aspects on how to control composition and deposit morphology using co-electrodeposited kesterite alloy precursors as a case study. The alloy precursors co-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electronic density of oxygen in the corresponding samples was measured by O1s XPS ( Figure 4 D). The PbO-based samples with 0–1.0 wt % Pt show twin O1s XPS peaks, which can be deconvoluted into three peaks at 528.9 eV (surface lattice oxygen, O S-L ), 530.9 eV (surface oxygen of –OH, O 2− and CO 3 2− , O S ), and 532.4 eV (adsorbed of water or organics) ( Yang et al., 2017 , Xu et al., 2015 , Ge and Yan, 2018 ). In contrast, the O1s XPS of the Al 2 O 3 -supported sample only shows a single peak centered at 531.4 eV, combining the lattice O, –OH, and water peaks at 530.6, 531.5, and 532.5 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electronic density of oxygen in the corresponding samples was measured by O1s XPS ( Figure 4 D). The PbO-based samples with 0–1.0 wt % Pt show twin O1s XPS peaks, which can be deconvoluted into three peaks at 528.9 eV (surface lattice oxygen, O S-L ), 530.9 eV (surface oxygen of –OH, O 2− and CO 3 2− , O S ), and 532.4 eV (adsorbed of water or organics) ( Yang et al., 2017 , Xu et al., 2015 , Ge and Yan, 2018 ). In contrast, the O1s XPS of the Al 2 O 3 -supported sample only shows a single peak centered at 531.4 eV, combining the lattice O, –OH, and water peaks at 530.6, 531.5, and 532.5 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XPS measurements suggest that this as-grown sample has adventitious organic surface contaminations evidenced by the presence of spurious peaks, one at 288.0 eV corresponding to O–CO and another at 531.7 eV corresponding to C–O–H (panels (a,b) of Figure S8). The intense O 1s peak at 529.5 eV corresponds well to O 2– in the oxides. As shown in Figure a, the 2p core-level XPS profile of cobalt acquired with Al Kα irradiation holds intricate features owing to the overlap with its Auger lines (LMM) and strong backgrounds. As a result, accurate peak-fitting analysis of the Co 2p profile is difficult, and it is also meaningless to discern the valence states of cobalt by fitting the 2p profile. , Nonetheless, a set of sharp Co 2p peaks centered at 780.5 and 795.6 eV, along with a broad satellite structure located at about 9 eV higher in binding energy, are characteristic of low-spin O h Co 3+ in LiCoO 2 or spinel Co 3 O 4 . ,, Figure b shows an XPS profile acquired at the core-level regions of Co 3p and Li 1s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…XPS measurements suggest that this as-grown sample has adventitious organic surface contaminations evidenced by the presence of spurious peaks, one at 288.0 eV corresponding to O−CO and another at 531.7 eV corresponding to C−O−H (panels (a,b) of Figure S8). 50 The intense O 1s peak at 529.5 eV corresponds well to O 2− in the oxides. 50−55 As shown in Figure 9a, the 2p core-level XPS profile of cobalt acquired with Al Kα irradiation holds intricate features owing to the overlap with its Auger lines (LMM) and strong backgrounds.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In 2013, they further improved equipment and craft, employing the Cu, Zn, and Sn evaporation source of Knudsen type and Veeco S source box in metal tantalum with valves; the substrate temperature were increased from 110°C to 150°C, and the annealing temperature were increased from 540°C to 570°C while maintain the annealing time for 5 minutes. Although the film was only 600 nm, they still obtained the CZTS solar cells with an efficiency of 8.4%, which is currently the highest CZTS cells efficiency without Se [13].…”
Section: Vacuum Deposition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%