2013
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201349012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controllable amplification, absorption, and dispersion in double‐cascade‐type four‐level system of multiple quantum wells

Abstract: A double-cascade-type four-level system of semiconductor multiple quantum wells (MQWs) was constructed with biexcitons and excitons. The nonlinear optical properties for amplification, absorption, and dispersion of 2-weak fields in this scheme are investigated. It shows that the amplification, absorption, and dispersion responses of 2-weak fields can be achieved by appropriately adjusting the relative phase, the probe detuning, and the two control Rabi frequencies. The investigation is much more practical than… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…) of the generated FWM field at the exit z = L and E p (in) is the electric field E P (E p | 2 = 4ħ 2 |Ω p | 2 /|μ 01 | 2 ) of the probe field at the entrance z = 0 [31,[38][39][40][41][42]. According to (30) we can get that To investigate the effect of the Fano interference on the FWM, we plot in figure 6 versus drive field Ω d and decay rates of biexciton state r 3 at p = 0.5 with k 01 = k 02 = 1 × 10 19 m -1 s -1 , r 2 = 1 × 10 7 Hz, Ω c = 1 × 10 13 Hz ω s = 1.1ω p , z = 5 μm and Δ 1 = Δ 2 = Δ 3 = 0.…”
Section: Dynamic Analysis Of Fwmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) of the generated FWM field at the exit z = L and E p (in) is the electric field E P (E p | 2 = 4ħ 2 |Ω p | 2 /|μ 01 | 2 ) of the probe field at the entrance z = 0 [31,[38][39][40][41][42]. According to (30) we can get that To investigate the effect of the Fano interference on the FWM, we plot in figure 6 versus drive field Ω d and decay rates of biexciton state r 3 at p = 0.5 with k 01 = k 02 = 1 × 10 19 m -1 s -1 , r 2 = 1 × 10 7 Hz, Ω c = 1 × 10 13 Hz ω s = 1.1ω p , z = 5 μm and Δ 1 = Δ 2 = Δ 3 = 0.…”
Section: Dynamic Analysis Of Fwmmentioning
confidence: 99%