1992
DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(92)90160-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controllability of bilinear systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Our second example illustrates the tightness of the Gramianbased lower bound (16) for the input energy functional.…”
Section: Minimum Input Energy For Reachabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…• Our second example illustrates the tightness of the Gramianbased lower bound (16) for the input energy functional.…”
Section: Minimum Input Energy For Reachabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , K − 1 and noting V (x(0)) = 0, we get (16). The sufficient condition (15) is a magnitude constraint at every actuator.…”
Section: Minimum Input Energy For Reachabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main interest of bilinear systems lies in the fact that many important processes, not only in engineering, but also in biology, socio-economics, and ecology, can be modeled by bilinear systems [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The fundamental property of bilinear systems, say, controllability, has been extensively studied for both continuous-time and discrete-time cases [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Since a discrete-time approximation to a bilinear system is essential for computer simulation or digital control purpose [28][29][30], a natural question is that whether the discretization changes the system controllability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, we show that, in comparison with the controllability criterion of this paper, the counterexample presented by [1] is a special case of the proposed necessary and sufficient conditions. Finally, by noting that system (1) is uncontrollable in any finite dimension [4,14,22], it is shown that the discretization counterpart of (1), say system (2), is also uncontrollable if its dimension is greater than two.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%