2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2004.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrôlabilité à zéro avec contraintes sur le contrôle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, if we suppose that, for instance v 1 = 0 on (0, T ) × ω, this lemma implies that To obtain a control satisfying the constraints (3.5), we follow the method presented in [15] and used in [6]. We will prove an improved observability inequality.…”
Section: Consequently A(t ) = 0 and θ(T ) = 0 If And Only Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, if we suppose that, for instance v 1 = 0 on (0, T ) × ω, this lemma implies that To obtain a control satisfying the constraints (3.5), we follow the method presented in [15] and used in [6]. We will prove an improved observability inequality.…”
Section: Consequently A(t ) = 0 and θ(T ) = 0 If And Only Ifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). In Section 5, we give an application of the above results to the sentinels theory of Lions as revisited in [16].…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also refer to Barbu [1], Doubova et al [5], Fabre et al [6], Fernández-Cara [7], Fernández-Cara and Guerrero [8], Zuazua [18,20], and their bibliography for other related controllability problems. The null-controllability problem (1), (4) and (5) in the case K = {0} has been studied by the author in [16] when K is of finite dimension. In this case, some compatibility conditions are requiered for controllability to hold.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition (4) extends the one by Lions to the case where the observation and the control have different supports. This point of view (where ω = O) has been considered for the first time by Nakoulima in [15]. Here we avoid the trivial solution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%