1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)11311-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of tuberculosis by community health workers in Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
48
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in keeping with other studies conducted in South Africa (Dick et al 1997), Thailand (Kamolratanakul et al 1999, Bangladesh (Chowdhury et al 1997) and China (China Tuberculosis Control Collaboration 1996). Our study was different from other randomized trials of DOT, conducted in Pakistan (Walley et al 2001) and South Africa (Zwarenstein et al 1998), in that the observer was a non-family member of the same community and there was no self-supervision.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results are in keeping with other studies conducted in South Africa (Dick et al 1997), Thailand (Kamolratanakul et al 1999, Bangladesh (Chowdhury et al 1997) and China (China Tuberculosis Control Collaboration 1996). Our study was different from other randomized trials of DOT, conducted in Pakistan (Walley et al 2001) and South Africa (Zwarenstein et al 1998), in that the observer was a non-family member of the same community and there was no self-supervision.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Chowdhury and colleagues reported that a successful TB control programme by community health workers in Bangladesh improved case-finding and treatment compliance. 29 A similar achievement was reported from the Philippines. 15 However, no data have so far been published on the effect of such interventions on pre-treatment symptom duration.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…After 2 and 8 weeks of inception of treatment regimen uric acid level was detected 5.6 ± 2.1 and 5.7 ± 2.5 mg/dL (Table III) (Chowdhury et al, 1997), on microscopic diagnosis (Vandeun and Portalels, 1998) and drug resistance surveillance (Haque et al, 1995).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%