2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.06.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of the drag on a spacecraft in the earth’s ionosphere using the spacecraft’s magnetic field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current state of developing HDSs and aerodynamic means of debris removal can be estimated from analysing studies [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Thus, it is proposed in [10,11] to use a permanent magnet harpoon system for SDOs, which increases the reliability of the harpoon devices of SD removal. Also, the onboard energy consumption is reduced compared to the transfer of an SDO to a lower orbit with the help of a motor CSC.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current state of developing HDSs and aerodynamic means of debris removal can be estimated from analysing studies [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Thus, it is proposed in [10,11] to use a permanent magnet harpoon system for SDOs, which increases the reliability of the harpoon devices of SD removal. Also, the onboard energy consumption is reduced compared to the transfer of an SDO to a lower orbit with the help of a motor CSC.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its principle (Smith et al 2022) is to use electromagnetic method to control the weakly ionized plasma, decelerate the aircraft and push away the shock wave. So far, with the development of magnetic control technology, the use of electromagnetic methods for aircraft thermal protection has gradually become feasible (Shuvalov et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the active ones, the passive deorbit systems require neither fuel consumption for their operation (almost do not require on-board energy consumption, except for electromagnetic systems) nor control of the relative motion of the removed spacecraft. Today, the known passive systems for deorbiting space debris from LEO are drag augmentation devices (DADs) [17][18][19], bare electrodynamic tethers (BET) [20,21], electromagnetic tethers (EMT) [22], and space debris deorbit systems with the use of permanent magnets (PMS) [23]. All these systems have a good scientific and theoretical justification and confirmation by space or ground laboratory experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%