2009
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2009)135:1(13)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of Scour at Bridge Piers by a Downstream Bed Sill

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
32
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The scour depth reduction at the end of the test was only 8% higher than that observed for a single bed sill (Table 1). Figure 3 also shows that, although the maximum scour depth was located inside the vanes, two additional scour holes occurred downstream and relatively far away from the pier and the bed sill, for which the lower parts of the wake vortices were responsible (Grimaldi et al 2009a). …”
Section: Combination Of Submerged Vanes and A Bed Sillmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scour depth reduction at the end of the test was only 8% higher than that observed for a single bed sill (Table 1). Figure 3 also shows that, although the maximum scour depth was located inside the vanes, two additional scour holes occurred downstream and relatively far away from the pier and the bed sill, for which the lower parts of the wake vortices were responsible (Grimaldi et al 2009a). …”
Section: Combination Of Submerged Vanes and A Bed Sillmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These countermeasures were individually evaluated by Tafarojnoruz et al (2012) in configurations recommended, respectively, by Ghorbani and Kells (2008) and Grimaldi et al (2009a) as pier scour countermeasures, indicating that the efficiency of single countermeasures is below 20% (Table 1). In Test A1, a combination of the two countermeasures in the best of each configuration was considered (Table 1).…”
Section: Combination Of Submerged Vanes and A Bed Sillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the fact that a bed sill across the whole section of the channel would result in significant scouring near the side wall [28,38,39], a bed sill with a limited length (L bs ) of 2D, viz. L bs =0.32 m, and a thickness of 3 mm is tested in this study.…”
Section: Downstream Bed Sillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haque et al [27] studied the effect of three side-by-side piles located upstream of a rectangle pier in currents and found that up to half of the scour depth could be reduced. Grimaldi et al [28] used a downstream bed sill to control the scour under current actions. The scour depth could be reduced by 26% and the bed sill placed 0.5D downstream of the pile (D=pile diameter) would reduce over 80% of scour area and volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches and design criteria have been suggested to reduce the scour at bridge piers, including different countermeasures such as collars (Ettema, 1980;Tanaka and Yano, 1967;Thomas, 1967), bed-sills (Grimaldi et al, 2009a(Grimaldi et al, , 2009b, Iowa vanes (Ghorbani and Kells, 2008;Odgaard and Wang, 1987), collar-ripraps (Chiew, 1995;Zarrati et al, 2006) and slot-collars (Kumar et al, 1999;Moncada-M et al, 2009). In addition, several studies reported in the literature deal with bridge pier scour in the presence of debris accumulation (Diehl, 1997;Lagasse et al, 2009;Melville and Dongol, 1992;Carnacina, 2010, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%