2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4913942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of offset field and pinning stability in perpendicular magnetic tunnelling junctions with synthetic antiferromagnetic coupling multilayer

Abstract: In a magnetic tunnelling junction (MTJ) with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA), offset field (Ho) of the free layer is usually controlled by using a synthetic antiferromagnetic (SAF) coupling structure, which is composed of an antiferromagnetic coupling (AFC) layer sandwiched by two ferromagnetic (FM) layers. However, Ho increases significantly as the size of MTJ devices shrinks to accommodate high density. In addition, magnetostatic field in PMA SAF structure tends to destabilize the antiferromagnetic (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stray fields in the UL that are generated in adjacent magnetic layers in both the pinned and free structures as well as those in the FL that are generated in the pinned structure, can increase dramatically as the cell size enters the nanoscale range. [3][4][5][6][7] This can make the UL unstable, thus causing back-hopping write failures during current-induced magnetization switching, as well as occurrence of cross-talk in MTJ cell arrays. [5][6][7] Several structures were proposed for overcoming this drawback, such as stepped-edge MTJs, 3 counter-bias-magnetic-field layers, 4 and double SyFs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Stray fields in the UL that are generated in adjacent magnetic layers in both the pinned and free structures as well as those in the FL that are generated in the pinned structure, can increase dramatically as the cell size enters the nanoscale range. [3][4][5][6][7] This can make the UL unstable, thus causing back-hopping write failures during current-induced magnetization switching, as well as occurrence of cross-talk in MTJ cell arrays. [5][6][7] Several structures were proposed for overcoming this drawback, such as stepped-edge MTJs, 3 counter-bias-magnetic-field layers, 4 and double SyFs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7] This can make the UL unstable, thus causing back-hopping write failures during current-induced magnetization switching, as well as occurrence of cross-talk in MTJ cell arrays. [5][6][7] Several structures were proposed for overcoming this drawback, such as stepped-edge MTJs, 3 counter-bias-magnetic-field layers, 4 and double SyFs. 7 These structures, however, increase the fabrication complexity by requiring additional stages such as etching or the insertion of magnetic layers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The deviation of energy barriers along the two switching directions has a significant impact on the retention and the STT-switching characteristics of MTJ devices, as reported in [9][10][11]. In the extreme case where H z s intra exceeds the FL coercivity (H c ), defined as the reverse field needed to drive the magnetization of a ferromagnet to zero, the bistable states will disappear [5].…”
Section: B Magnetic Coupling Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Synthetic antiferromagnetic (SAF) multilayers [1] show promise as soft underlayers for perpendicular recording media [2, 3], high moment write head material [4], high frequency application [5] and magnetic tunnel junctions [6,7]. SAF multilayers are comprised of two ferromagnetic layers separated by a nonmagnetic metallic spacer layer in which the ferromagnetic layers are coupled through antiferromagnetic interlayer exchange.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%