The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Comprehensive Physiology 2021
DOI: 10.1002/cphy.c210020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of Mammalian Locomotion by Somatosensory Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 844 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that in the hindlimb-only conditions, the forelimbs are slightly raised on a platform and this potentially increases the load on the hindlimbs. During normal quadrupedal locomotion, cats bear a greater percentage of their bodyweight on their forelimbs because of the weight of the head and neck ( Frigon et al, 2021 ), while in the hindlimb-only conditions with elevated forelimbs, there is a caudal shift of the body’s center of mass and consequently more weight on the hindlimbs. However, our results do not show an increase in the duration of stance consistent with increased load on the hindlimb ( Duysens and Pearson, 1980 ; Conway et al, 1987 ; Bouyer and Rossignol, 2003 ; Frigon, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that in the hindlimb-only conditions, the forelimbs are slightly raised on a platform and this potentially increases the load on the hindlimbs. During normal quadrupedal locomotion, cats bear a greater percentage of their bodyweight on their forelimbs because of the weight of the head and neck ( Frigon et al, 2021 ), while in the hindlimb-only conditions with elevated forelimbs, there is a caudal shift of the body’s center of mass and consequently more weight on the hindlimbs. However, our results do not show an increase in the duration of stance consistent with increased load on the hindlimb ( Duysens and Pearson, 1980 ; Conway et al, 1987 ; Bouyer and Rossignol, 2003 ; Frigon, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spinal animals (i.e., animals with a spinal transection or spinalization) have been instrumental in our understanding of the neural control of locomotion, particularly its spinal control, by comparing the locomotor pattern in the intact and spinal states ( Rossignol et al, 2006 ; Frigon, 2020 ). Spinal animals with a thoracic transection recover hindlimb locomotion due to the presence of spinal locomotor networks, called central pattern generators ( CPGs ), that interact with somatosensory feedback from the limbs ( Rossignol et al, 2006 ; McCrea and Rybak, 2008 ; Rossignol and Frigon, 2011 ; Kiehn, 2016 ; Frigon et al, 2021 ). However, in spinal animals, the forelimbs are often placed on a stationary platform or suspended in the air while the hindlimbs perform locomotor movements ( Forssberg et al, 1980b ; Smith et al, 1982 ; Giuliani and Smith, 1985 ; Robinson and Goldberger, 1986 ; Barbeau and Rossignol, 1987 ; Lovely et al, 1990 ; Leblond et al, 2003 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weak interlimb coupling of neonates may also depend on immature sensory feedback from load signals and hip-position signals 24 , 67 , 68 . Sensory feedback may also contribute to shape neuromuscular modularity, expanding or compressing the number of modules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously compared the results of factorization of neonatal EMG activities during ground stepping and spontaneous kicking 36 . While neonatal stepping is triggered by the contact with the support surface and involves strong sensory signals about limb load and hip extension 24 , 67 , 68 , sensory inputs are not necessary for triggering spontaneous kicking movements, which involve limited feedback about limb load and hip extension. We found that kicking involves activation patterns with a similar dimensionality and waveform as those of more mature locomotion, but they lack a stable association with systematic muscle synergies across movements 36 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest that stimulation of cutaneous and proprioceptive afferents in the distal tibial nerve provides functionally meaningful motion-dependent sensory feedback, and stimulation responses depend on limb conditions. Keywords: tactile sensation, distal tibial nerve stimulation, quadrupedal locomotion Somatosensory motion-dependent feedback is a critical component of the locomotor control system, and terrestrial legged animals from insects to humans have evolved similar sensory modalities and control mechanisms that provide for stable and efficient locomotion; see recent reviews (Edwards & Prilutsky, 2017;Frigon et al, 2021;Tuthill & Azim, 2018). Specifically, length-and loaddependent sensory feedback entrains locomotor rhythm (Kriellaars et al, 1994;Pearson & Collins, 1993) and regulates the level of muscle or motoneuronal activity (af Klint et al, 2010;Akay et al, 2004;Chung et al, 2015;Guertin et al, 1995;Lam & Pearson, 2002) and timing of the transitions between the swing (flexor) and stance (extensor) phases of the locomotor cycle (Schomburg et al, 1998;Stecina et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%