Introduction The three major unresolved problems in bone-anchored limb prosthetics are stable, infection-free integration of skin with a percutaneous bone implant, robust skeletal fixation between the implant and host bone, and a secure interface of sensory nerves and muscles with a prosthesis for the intuitive bidirectional prosthetic control. Here we review results of our completed work and report on recent progress. Materials and Methods Eight female adult cats received skin- and bone-integrated pylon (SBIP) and eight male adult cats received SBIP-peripheral neural interface (PNI) pylon into the right distal tibia. The latter pylons provided PNI for connection between a powered sensing transtibial prosthesis and electrodes in residual soleus muscle and on residual distal tibial nerve. If signs of infection were absent 28-70 days after implantation, cats started wearing a passive prosthesis. We recorded and analyzed full-body mechanics of level and slope locomotion in five cats with passive prostheses and in one cat with a powered sensing prosthesis. We also performed histological analyses of tissue integration with the implants in nine cats. Four pigs received SBIPs into the left hindlimb and two pigs—into the left forelimb. We recorded vertical ground reaction forces before amputation and following osseointegration. We also conducted pullout postmortem tests on the implanted pylons. One pig received in dorsum the modified SBIPs with and without silver coating. Results Six cats from the SBIP groups had implant for 70 days. One cat developed infection and did not receive prosthesis. Five cats had pylon for 148 to 183 days, showed substantial loading of the prosthesis during locomotion (40.4% below presurgery control), and demonstrated deep ingrowth of skin and bone tissue into SBIP (over 60%). Seven of eight cats from the SBIP-PNI group demonstrated poor pylon integration without clinical signs of infection. One cat had prosthesis for 824 days (27 months). The use of the bidirectionally controlled prosthesis by this animal during level walking demonstrated increased vertical loading to nearly normal values, although the propulsion force was significantly reduced. From the study on pigs, it was found that symmetry in loading between the intact and prosthetic limbs during locomotion was 80 ± 5.5%. Skin-implant interface was infection-free, but developed a stoma, probably because of the high mobility of the skin and soft tissues in the pig’s thigh. Dorsal implantation resulted in the infection-free deep ingrowth of skin into the SBIP implants. Conclusions Cats with SBIP (n = 5) and SBIP-PNI (n = 1) pylons developed a sound interface with the residuum skin and bone and demonstrated substantial loading of prosthetic limb during locomotion. One animal with SBIP developed infection and seven cats with SBIP-PNI demonstrated poor bone integration without signs of infection. Future studies of the SBIP-PNI should focus on reliability of integration with the residuum. Ongoing study with pigs requires decreasing the extra mobility of skin and soft tissues until the skin seal is developed within the SBIP implant.
The obtained results suggest that the studied ranges of grab bar configurations reduce moment demands on the leg joints and thus decrease difficulty and required lower limb muscle effort to perform the transfers. Implications for Rehabilitation Maximizing the benefits of assistive technology in the built environment requires a careful assessment of their spatial and configurational dimensions, especially in respect to the needs and abilities of the intended users. Examining the kinetic characteristics of transfers to and from a toilet using the swing-away grab bars is useful for informing grab bar design and configuration recommendations for assisted living and skilled nursing facilities. Our findings suggest that the swing-away grab bars located at certain ranges are a reasonable alternative to the grab bars mandated by the current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Accessibility Guidelines. Future research investigating the effects of grab bars on transfer performance should consider additional factors, such as a wider range of abilities and transfer methods of the users.
Cutaneous feedback from feet is involved in regulation of muscle activity during locomotion, and the lack of this feedback results in motor deficits. We tested the hypothesis that locomotor changes caused by local unilateral anesthesia of paw pads in the cat could be reduced/reversed by electrical stimulation of cutaneous and proprioceptive afferents in the distal tibial nerve during stance. Several split-belt conditions were investigated in four adult female cats. In addition, we investigated the effects of similar distal tibial nerve stimulation on overground walking of one male cat that had a transtibial, bone-anchored prosthesis for 29 months and, thus, had no cutaneous/proprioceptive feedback from the foot. In all treadmill conditions, cats walked with intact cutaneous feedback (control), with right fore- and hindpaw pads anesthetized by lidocaine injections, and with a combination of anesthesia and electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral distal tibial nerve during the stance phase at 1.2× threshold of afferent activation. Electrical stimulation of the distal tibial nerve during the stance phase of walking with anesthetized ipsilateral paw pads reversed or significantly reduced the effects of paw pad anesthesia on several kinematic variables, including lateral center of mass shift, cycle and swing durations, and duty factor. We also found that stimulation of the residual distal tibial nerve in the prosthetic hindlimb often had different effects on kinematics compared with stimulation of the intact hindlimb with paw anesthetized. We suggest that stimulation of cutaneous and proprioceptive afferents in the distal tibial nerve provides functionally meaningful motion-dependent sensory feedback, and stimulation responses depend on limb conditions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.