2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of combustion instabilities by local injection of hydrogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6,7 Damping combustion instabilities is one method to ensure a safe combustor operation. This has been done successfully by active [8][9][10][11][12] or passive 13,14 damping methods. However, since these methods have to be specifically adjusted to a given burner system, it would be preferable to avoid combustion instabilities by an adequate combustor design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 Damping combustion instabilities is one method to ensure a safe combustor operation. This has been done successfully by active [8][9][10][11][12] or passive 13,14 damping methods. However, since these methods have to be specifically adjusted to a given burner system, it would be preferable to avoid combustion instabilities by an adequate combustor design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H2 addition increases the lean operation limits, reducing the risk of flame blow-off, and has been observed in previous studies to improve flame ignitability and stability, as well as reduce pressure and heat release perturbations [14,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Barbosa et al [35] investigated the effect of injecting hydrogen in a lean premixed propaneair flame on the combustion oscillations. The authors reported a significant reduction in the amplitude of pressure oscillations but a negligible change in the heat release oscillations, which was attributed to the injected hydrogen decoupling the acoustic and heat release oscillations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Examples of actuators used to achieve these physical property changes (note that these same actuators can be and are used in the closed-loop studies as well) include valves that oscillate the air (or fuel) fl ow rate into the combustor (e.g., Bloxsidge et al, 1988;Tuncer et al, 2005;Uhm and Acharya, 2004), speakers that excite acoustic oscillations with desired phase and amplitude within the combustor (e.g., Paschereit et al, 1999), synthetic jet actuators (Ritchie et al, 2000) that introduce vortical features at the small scale to enhance mixing, and secondary or primary fuel injection manipulations (e.g., Auer et al, 2005;Barbosa et al, 2007;Cohen and Rey, 1999;Cohen et al, 2001;Ghoniem et al, 2005;Gutmark et al, 1998;Hathout et al, 2002;Jones et al, 1999;Kim et al, 2000;Lal et al, 2003aLal et al, , 2004Lang et al, 1987;Langhorne et al, 1990;Richards et al, 1999;Yi and Gutmark, 2007a, b;Yu and Wilson, 2002;Yu et al, 1996;Zinn and Neumeier, 1997) that modulate the injection rate of all or a fraction of the supplied fuel. As this reference list suggests, controlling the fuel fl ow rate or modulating the fuel (primary or secondary) has become a major area of ACS for combustion control since this approach directly targets the source of combustion.…”
Section: Experimental Studies Of Control Of Combustion Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%