2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.02.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control of cell adhesion and spreading by spatial microarranged PEO-like and pdAA domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is illustrated in Figure 4, where cells cover only a masked part of the Petri dishes that had been covered by the 1 W PEO‐like films. In contrast, coatings prepared at higher than 1 W exhibited better cell adhesion properties with a percentage of adhering cells similar to the control in the case of films deposited with RF power higher than 5 W. This results are in agreement with published works where it has shown that a percentage larger than 70% of PEO retention is required for obtaining a repellent effect toward cell attachment 29,48…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is illustrated in Figure 4, where cells cover only a masked part of the Petri dishes that had been covered by the 1 W PEO‐like films. In contrast, coatings prepared at higher than 1 W exhibited better cell adhesion properties with a percentage of adhering cells similar to the control in the case of films deposited with RF power higher than 5 W. This results are in agreement with published works where it has shown that a percentage larger than 70% of PEO retention is required for obtaining a repellent effect toward cell attachment 29,48…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The behavior of cells, in this case, is driven by gradients/contrasts of different chemical functionalities on the substrate. The following sequence of steps is a procedure59–61 that has been applied to transfer micro‐arrangements of cell‐adhesive and cell‐repulsive domains on surfaces on polymeric substrates: plasma‐treatment or PE‐CVD process that aims to obtain a homogeneous cell‐adhesive surface all over the substrate; positioning of the physical mask in close contact with the substrate; plasma treatment or PE‐CVD process that aims to obtain cell‐repulsive surfaces, performed through the physical mask. …”
Section: Plasma‐processed Surfaces Patterned With Alternated Cell‐adhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1) Plasma modification of the substrate, 2) plasma patterning through TEM grids60 and 3) through nanocolloidal latex beads85,86 masks to obtain, respectively, micro‐ and nanosized features. A plasma process can be performed before the patterning procedure to obtain chemically different domains or to improve the self assembly of the colloidal particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High versatility, minimum consumption of reagents, no use of solvents, high/easy integration in existing industrial processes are other advantages of the technique. In surface engineering of biomaterials and devices low pressure (LP) have a longer tradition than atmospheric pressure (AP) plasma processes [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. However, also AP plasmas are being investigated for surface engineering of biomaterials, as we will show in the text, but they entered recently in this field.…”
Section: Cold Plasmas For Life Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AP Plasma Liquid Deposition (AP-PLD) and AP Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapours Depositions (AP-PECVD). LP Plasma deposited PEO-like coatings are known for their non fouling properties in water media against protein, cells and bacteria [4,38,39]. In the AP-PLD process, liquid CH 3 O(CH 2 CH 2 O) 4 CH 3 (TEGDME) was sprayed on the substrate and then exposed to an Ar AP plasma torch.…”
Section: Atmospheric Pressure Cold Plasmas For Materials Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%