2015
DOI: 10.1109/jproc.2015.2484344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control Architecture for High Power Electronics Converters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2-D torus was selected as the best compromise of number of communication links and performance. The proposed multi-hop network topology is widely used for large-scale distributed computing systems to smallerscale networks-on-chip [72]- [75]. However, while these Decoding sequence Ts networks seek to minimize average-case latency for varying dynamic traffic, a PEBB controller network must guarantee a worst-case latency for regular static traffic.…”
Section: A Multi-hop Network Based Coordination Of Power Electronicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2-D torus was selected as the best compromise of number of communication links and performance. The proposed multi-hop network topology is widely used for large-scale distributed computing systems to smallerscale networks-on-chip [72]- [75]. However, while these Decoding sequence Ts networks seek to minimize average-case latency for varying dynamic traffic, a PEBB controller network must guarantee a worst-case latency for regular static traffic.…”
Section: A Multi-hop Network Based Coordination Of Power Electronicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that all main converter systems located at the main bus can be share a network distributed application control with total roundtrip latency on the order of 100µs-200µs. This is acceptable since Application control for converter applications has a cycle time that is typically in the lower millisecond range [9].…”
Section: Communication-based Application Layer Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faster time scales translate to a need for more capable control systems that is usually being met through the use of FPGA based platforms. Both of those trends have resulted in the continued evolution of the Universal Controller Architecture (UCA) which attempts to standardize control interfaces for modular power electronic systems [8,9]. Further development of interface definitions and increasing communication and computational capabilities of new FPGA based controllers provides opportunities beyond simply supporting SiC PEBB based converters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Ginn et al, 2015;Lucia et al, 2018), advantages of control methods of power electronic converters have been presented and various methods for control these converters have been provided. However, the usage of the linear controller such as P or PI is the main weakness of these references.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%