2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.pld.2020.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions to the flora of Myanmar from 2000 to 2019

Abstract: Myanmar is botanically rich and floristically diverse: one of the world's biodiversity hotspots. However, Myanmar is still very unevenly explored, and until a plant checklist was published in 2003, relatively little work was done on its flora. This checklist included 11,800 species of spermatophytes in 273 families. Since this checklist was published, the botanical exploration of Myanmar has accelerated and there have been many additional publications. We therefore surveyed the literature of taxonomic contribu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While it is necessary to send foreign plant taxonomists to the right geographical locations, especially in the tropics [23], our study highlights that training and supporting resident taxonomists to describe their endemic species should be a priority [4]. Specifically, we suggest that support for natural history or the popular science of nature is a key step to prevent ‘plant blindness’ of the general public [28], and to attract and train young generations to study plant taxonomy [26,29]. This support should include para-taxonomist training and professional taxonomy courses supported by experts from botanical gardens, museums, universities and NGOs, as well as cooperative training programs with foreign institutions [4,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is necessary to send foreign plant taxonomists to the right geographical locations, especially in the tropics [23], our study highlights that training and supporting resident taxonomists to describe their endemic species should be a priority [4]. Specifically, we suggest that support for natural history or the popular science of nature is a key step to prevent ‘plant blindness’ of the general public [28], and to attract and train young generations to study plant taxonomy [26,29]. This support should include para-taxonomist training and professional taxonomy courses supported by experts from botanical gardens, museums, universities and NGOs, as well as cooperative training programs with foreign institutions [4,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings show that there is an urgent need for inventories, herbarium work, nomenclature, identification, and comparative studies of plant diversity in Southeast Asia, the global biodiversity hotspots. As mentioned, therefore, there is a need to attract young scientists to specialize in plant taxonomy in Southeast Asia ( Yang et al., 2020 ). Over the past twenty years, the Chinese Plant Names Index (CPNI) has added many vascular plans of China ( Du et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These new taxa and records are mainly distributed in southeast Xizang, the Hengduan Mountains and southeast Yunnan, which are regarded as hotspots of orchid diversity as well as hotspots for China's endemic flora in general ( Zhang et al., 2015 ; Huang et al., 2016 ). The majority of our knowledge of orchids from these regions is accumulated from floras ( Chen et al., 2009 ; Xu et al., 2010 ; Jin et al., 2019 ), ongoing regional surveys ( Jin et al., 2018 ; Wang et al., 2018 ) and descriptions of new species ( Hu et al., 2013 ; Averyanov et al., 2015 , 2019 ; Liu et al., 2016a ; Zhai et al., 2017 ; Zhang et al., 2017 ; Cai et al., 2019 ; Li et al., 2019 ; Ya et al., 2019a , b ; Aung et al., 2020 ; Du et al., 2020 ; Yang et al., 2020 ). The geographic distributions of many species remain unknown, and the potential discovery of undescribed orchid species, especially in the shrinking primeval forests of the region, requires continued field work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%