Contributions of the voluntary local review process to policy integration: evidence from frontrunner cities

Ortiz-Moya, Fernando; Reggiani, Marco

doi:10.1038/s42949-023-00101-4

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It has been estimated that local governments are in crucial position in delivering for most of the SDG targets (see Ortiz-Moya and Reggiani, 2023). As such the mosaic of the many targets under the umbrella of 17 sustainable development goals defined by the Agenda 2030 is impressive.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dimensions of cultural sustainability—Local adaptation, adaptive capacity and social resilience

Järvelä

2023

Front. Polit. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cultural sustainability relates to sustainable development. According to UNESCO “culture provides the necessary transformative dimension that ensures the sustainability of development processes.” Originally sustainable development was defined through three dimensions-ecological, economic and social dimension. Further, the social dimension has been understood in multiple ways often accentuating socio-economic assets of development rather than socio-cultural capacities. Eventually, there has been an increasing interest in defining cultural sustainability as a fourth pillar of sustainable development. While becoming aware of the contemporary supranational risks such as climate change, COVID 19-pandemia or escalating military conflicts, sustainable development can hardly be envisioned in terms of linear progress but rather considered with anticipation of eventual shocks, interruptions, and vulnerabilities related to development. In this perspective, cultural sustainability can be increasingly associated with identifying vulnerabilities and with envisioning attainable measures of adaptation. This article addresses the complex issue of defining cultural sustainability through lenses of social resilience and adaptive capacity at local level.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dimensions of cultural sustainability—Local adaptation, adaptive capacity and social resilience

Järvelä

2023

Front. Polit. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Pioneering a sustainable development goals monitoring framework for European regions

Lella,

Oses-Eraso,

Stamos

2024

Ecological Indicators

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scoping article: research frontiers on the governance of the Sustainable Development Goals

Hickmann,

Biermann,

Sénit

et al. 2024

Glob. Sustain.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Non-Technical Summary. This article takes stock of the 2030 Agenda and focuses on five governance areas. In a nutshell, we see a quite patchy and often primarily symbolic uptake of the global goals. Although some studies highlight individual success stories of actors and institutions to implement the goals, it remains unclear how such cases can be upscaled and develop a broader political impact to accelerate the global endeavor to achieve sustainable development. We hence raise concerns about the overall effectiveness of governance by goal-setting and raise the question of how we can make this mode of governance more effective. Technical Summary. A recent meta-analysis on the political impact of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has shown that these global goals are moving political processes forward only incrementally, with much variation across countries, sectors, and governance levels. Consequently, the realization of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development remains uncertain. Against this backdrop, this article explores where and how incremental political changes are taking place due to the SDGs, and under what conditions these developments can bolster sustainability transformations up to 2030 and beyond. Our scoping review builds upon an online expert survey directed at the scholarly community of the 'Earth System Governance Project' and structured dialogues within the 'Taskforce on the SDGs' under this project. We identified five governance areas where some effects of the SDGs have been observable: (1) global governance, (2) national policy integration, (3) subnational initiatives, (4) private governance, and (5) education and learning for sustainable development. This article delves deeper into these governance areas and draws lessons to guide empirical research on the promises and pitfalls of accelerating SDG implementation. Social Media Summary. As SDG implementation lags behind, this article explores 5 governance areas asking how to strengthen the global goals. 10Thomas Hickmann et al.

show abstract

Contributions of the voluntary local review process to policy integration: evidence from frontrunner cities

Cited by 4 publications

References 51 publications

Dimensions of cultural sustainability—Local adaptation, adaptive capacity and social resilience

Dimensions of cultural sustainability—Local adaptation, adaptive capacity and social resilience

Pioneering a sustainable development goals monitoring framework for European regions

Scoping article: research frontiers on the governance of the Sustainable Development Goals

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About