2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-018-4153-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of pore-throat size distribution to reservoir quality and fluid distribution from NMR and MIP in tight sandy conglomerate reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation (2) indicates that there is a linear relation between the relaxation time T 2 and the pore diameter D. Thus, it is recognized that to calculate the pore diameters in a porous mediums based on its ρ 2 value. In several researches, ρ 2 values were calculated by comparing the T 2 spectrum curves with POSD results from mercury injection porosimetry technique as presented by Chen et al [33] and nitrogen gas adsorption technique as presented by Jahwar et al [34]. Besides, the ρ 2 values can be calculated by empirical formulas of permeability.…”
Section: Theoretical Background Of Nmri Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (2) indicates that there is a linear relation between the relaxation time T 2 and the pore diameter D. Thus, it is recognized that to calculate the pore diameters in a porous mediums based on its ρ 2 value. In several researches, ρ 2 values were calculated by comparing the T 2 spectrum curves with POSD results from mercury injection porosimetry technique as presented by Chen et al [33] and nitrogen gas adsorption technique as presented by Jahwar et al [34]. Besides, the ρ 2 values can be calculated by empirical formulas of permeability.…”
Section: Theoretical Background Of Nmri Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where (T 2 ) total is the transverse relaxation time; (T 2 ) B is the bulk fluid relaxation time; (T 2 ) S is the surface relaxation time; and (T 2 ) D is the diffusion relaxation time (all in ms). Because the diffusion relaxation and bulk fluid relaxation times are negligible compared with the surface relaxation time, the total relaxation time of the rock depends on surface relaxation [28,38]. e surface relaxation is related to the specific surface area of rocks (the ratio of pore surface area to pore volume).…”
Section: Nmr Eorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each has its own advantages and disadvantages. Mercury intrusion testing can analyze the pore throats of pore structures, but the pores and throats cannot be identified separately [28,29]. SEM can describe rock micropore structures but can only test a relatively small extent of the rock surface and so cannot provide overall pore structure information nor dynamically observe changes in pore structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely used in porosity calculations and permeability and movable fluid content evaluation. 14 , 17 The Mahu conglomerate reservoir has less ferromagnetic materials and larger particles, which is suitable for preparing large-size samples for testing, and NMR is an ideal method for testing its pore throat structure. The key to the test is to determine the conversion relationship between T 2 and the pore radius.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%