2014
DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2014.933430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contributions of Head-Mounted Cameras to Studying the Visual Environments of Infants and Young Children

Abstract: Head-mounted video cameras (with and without an eye camera to track gaze direction) are being increasingly used to study infants’ and young children’s visual environments and provide new and often unexpected insights about the visual world from a child’s point of view. The challenge in using head cameras is principally conceptual and concerns the match between what these cameras measure and the research question. Head cameras record the scene in front of faces and thus answer questions about those head-centere… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most notably, the visual perspective and the task of the HSP participants differ from those of the child in the video. With respect to the visual perspective, there is indeed a growing literature identifying differences between the information available from a 1 st person vs. 3 rd person view of a task or interaction, some of which were discussed in our introductory remarks (Yoshida & Smith, 2008; see also Kretch, Franchak & Adolph, 2014; Smith, Yu, Yoshida & Fausey, in press). Striking as these eye-view differences are, the question is how they impact the ability to read referential intent from these two camera angles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most notably, the visual perspective and the task of the HSP participants differ from those of the child in the video. With respect to the visual perspective, there is indeed a growing literature identifying differences between the information available from a 1 st person vs. 3 rd person view of a task or interaction, some of which were discussed in our introductory remarks (Yoshida & Smith, 2008; see also Kretch, Franchak & Adolph, 2014; Smith, Yu, Yoshida & Fausey, in press). Striking as these eye-view differences are, the question is how they impact the ability to read referential intent from these two camera angles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Head cameras measure the scene in front of the viewer but do not provide direct information as to momentary gaze, which in principle could be outside of the head camera image [38]. However, head mounted eye-tracking studies show that under active viewing conditions, human observers including infants typically turn both heads and eyes in the same direction, align heads and eyes within 500 ms of a directional shift, and maintain head and eye alignment when sustaining attention [44,46,48 -54].…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Collection Of The Corpusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Egocentric vision is an emerging field that studies vision from the individual perceiver's point of view; a viewpoint dependent on momentary location and bodily orientation [38][39][40][41]. Research with infants, toddlers and adults (e.g.…”
Section: (B) Visual Statistics As the Proposed Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These are becoming increasingly better understood with the rising use of head cameras (Aslin, 2009; Frank et al, 2013; Kretch et al, 2014; Schmitow & Stenberg, 2015; Schmitow, Stenberg, Billard, & von Hoffsten, 2013; Smith et al, 2014). One potential limit concerns the relation between eye and head direction, because head cameras measure head direction and not gaze direction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%