2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysarc.2013.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution to the design of a CMOS image sensor with low-complexity video compression for wireless sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We proved in [4,5] that CMOS hardware implementation can reduce time and energy costs related to software implementation of the proposed compression scheme. Time savings and energy gains are of the order of several thousands [4,5]. Fig.…”
Section: End Of Coding End Of Codingmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We proved in [4,5] that CMOS hardware implementation can reduce time and energy costs related to software implementation of the proposed compression scheme. Time savings and energy gains are of the order of several thousands [4,5]. Fig.…”
Section: End Of Coding End Of Codingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The cost of this superiority is a higher computational complexity. By cons, the final cost (energy consumption and memory footprint) of both processing and transmission of the compressed image is much better in the case of wavelet-transform-based encoders [4,5]. The proposed scheme is built around Haar wavelet transform (HWT) applied with SPIHT encoder and a low-complexity release of arithmetic encoding.…”
Section: The Proposed Image Compression Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The huge cost of uploading a 128x128 pixels -8bit image is 2200mJ in our case. With the use of local mean values and a dedicated digital block that compress the image (based on a chain of several transforms like Haar Wavelet) [5], we obtain with a good PSNR (>30dB) an energy cost up to 100mJ and a bit rate of 0,1bpp instead of 2200mJ and 8bpp (Fig. 6).…”
Section: Intra-pixel Interaction Capabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%