2017
DOI: 10.1177/0972150917710345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of International Trade in Human Development of Pakistan

Abstract: Very few studies have attempted to examine the relationship between international trade and human development. Some panel and cross-section studies have been done, but mostly Pakistan has not been included. This study examines for the first time ever the effect of aggregate and disaggregate trade on human development in Pakistan by using annual time series data from 1980 to 2013. This study contains five models in which human development with (a) total trade, (b) aggregate exports, (c) aggregate imports, (d) e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Their outcomes show that trade leads to higher standards of living in flexible economies, but not in rigid economies (Razmi & Yavari, 2012). Likewise, Zahonogo (2016) used the pooled mean group (PMG) estimator to explore the effect of trade on economic growth in 42 SSA countries from 1980 to 2012 and reported that trade openness has a positive impact on growth in one group and a negative relationship in another with subsequent distortion in income distribution (Adhikary, 2011;Jawaid & Waheed, 2017). Another strand finds that openness to trade has no impact on growth (Eris & Ulas an, 2013;Were, 2015).…”
Section: Trade-growth Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their outcomes show that trade leads to higher standards of living in flexible economies, but not in rigid economies (Razmi & Yavari, 2012). Likewise, Zahonogo (2016) used the pooled mean group (PMG) estimator to explore the effect of trade on economic growth in 42 SSA countries from 1980 to 2012 and reported that trade openness has a positive impact on growth in one group and a negative relationship in another with subsequent distortion in income distribution (Adhikary, 2011;Jawaid & Waheed, 2017). Another strand finds that openness to trade has no impact on growth (Eris & Ulas an, 2013;Were, 2015).…”
Section: Trade-growth Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical findings on the impact of trade on inclusive growth are mixed. While some studies show that trade improves socio-economic development (Dollar & Kraay, 2004;Hartmann & Hidalgo, 2017;Nourzad & Powell, 2003;Razmi & Yavari, 2012), others argue that trade distorts economic structures by tilting employment to skilled labor and capital which widens inequality gap (Jawaid & Waheed, 2017;Melitz, 2003;Milanovic & Squire, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To check the consistency of estimated coefficients estimated earlier, the long-run coefficients of aggregate and sector-wise models estimated through DOLS (Jawaid, Raza, Mustafa, & Karim, 2016; Jawaid & Waheed, 2017) are presented in Table 4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies discussed above presented mixed results. Some investigations evaluated a positive impact of globalization on human development (Eusufzai, 1996;Figueroa, 2014;Jawaid & Waheed, 2017;Olagunju et al, 2019;Yanikkaya, 2002) while other studies observed a negative relationship between globalization and human development (Dowrick & Golley, 2004;Sabi, 2007;Salvatore & Wiley, 2004). This study attempts to identify whether the discussed relationship has any positive or negative significance for developing countries.…”
Section: Review Of Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%