The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1992
DOI: 10.1016/0269-7491(92)90044-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribution of canopy leaching to sulphate deposition in a Scots pine forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In experimental leaching studies with 35 S below Scots pine, leaching of SO 2− 4 has been shown to be only a minor part (3%) of NTF flux of sulphur (Cape et al, 1992). Ulrich (1983) has estimated the same magnitudes for S leaching from senescent beech leaves.…”
Section: Inactive Ions In Canopy (Namentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In experimental leaching studies with 35 S below Scots pine, leaching of SO 2− 4 has been shown to be only a minor part (3%) of NTF flux of sulphur (Cape et al, 1992). Ulrich (1983) has estimated the same magnitudes for S leaching from senescent beech leaves.…”
Section: Inactive Ions In Canopy (Namentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Throughfall method has been approved as a reasonable method of estimating total and dry deposition of atmospheric pollutants to forest landscapes (Cape et al, 1992;Draaijers et al, 1996;Ferm and Hultberg, 1999;Rothe et al, 2002). Dry deposition measurements are difficult and expensive (Hicks and Meyers, 1988), while tree canopies serve as a natural surface and filter for trapping atmospheric pollutants, entering into the ecosystem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Berger et al (2008) study of a 65 years old spruce stand near Kreisbach (Austria) found a 129% relative increase of sulphur concentration under the crowns. Sulphate is a conservative anion which means it is neither taken up by canopy nor leached from the foliage (de Vries et al 2001;Balestrini et al 2007) or, more precisely said, the minor stomatal uptake of SO 2 is balanced by minute leaching of SO 4 2 -from needles (Cape et al 1992;Draaijers et al 1996). Th e increase of sulphate concentration in throughfall can be fully assigned to the washing of dry deposites accumulated on the canopy between precipitation events.…”
Section: Ion Concentrations In Bulk Precipitation and Throughfallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative SO 4 2-fluxes are likely due to dry deposition onto leaf surfaces. Contributions to net sulphur concentration of throughfall from foliar leaching have been recorded to be as low as 3% (Cape et al 1992;Granat and Hallgren 1992;Veltkamp and Wyers 1997). Cl -showed significant negative net fluxes (Table 6) in 1995 but not in 1996.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As much as 90% of the H + in precipitation passing through a canopy can be absorbed by the leaves (Cappellato et al 1993 Houle et al 1999). Foliar leaching is usually minimal for SO 4 2-, Cl -, and Na + (Granat and Hallgren 1992;Cape et al 1992;Veltkamp and Wyers 1997). NO 3 -can be either absorbed or leached (Neary and Gizyn 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%