2020
DOI: 10.34019/1809-8363.2018.v21.16411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribuições de um sistema tecnológico para a construção de ecomapas na atenção aos usuários hipertensos e diabéticos: estudo de caso com equipes NASF

Abstract: Rev. APS. 2018; out./dez.; 21 (4) Artigo originalRev. APS. 2018; out./dez.; 21 (4): 534 -550Contribuições de um sistema tecnológico para a construção de ecomapas na atenção aos usuários hipertensos e diabéticos: estudo de caso com equipes NASF Contribuições de um sistema tecnológico para a construção de ecomapas na atenção aos usuários hipertensos e diabéticos: estudo de caso com equipes nasf 535 Rev. APS. 2018; out./dez.; 21 (4): 534 -550 semiestruturadas, analisadas por meio da técnica de análise de discur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Statements and questions were entered in the HCMaps® software, with Android® and georeferencing features. At the end of data collection, we generated final database report compatible with Microsoft Excel® 26 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Statements and questions were entered in the HCMaps® software, with Android® and georeferencing features. At the end of data collection, we generated final database report compatible with Microsoft Excel® 26 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of data collection, we generated final database report compatible with Microsoft Excel®. 26 Analyses of primary data dimensions (Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) were carried out by tabulating the averages of items in each dimension, from which RE-AIM averages were obtained. The dimension averages for items on a Likert scale (Supporting Information S1) were calculated through their Individual Scores To calculate averages, the score 3 (indifferent) was weighed as zero (0).…”
Section: Inclusion and Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logo, torna-se necessário a melhor compreensão e adequação de um plano terapêutico para atender as necessidades de tratamento (16) .…”
Section: Métodosunclassified