Contrasting the Effects of Mortality Salience and Future Time Limitation on Goal Prioritization in Older and Younger Adults

Abstract

Objectives This study aims at contrasting the effects of limited future time perspective and mortality salience on goal prioritization across adulthood. Socioemotional selectivity theory (SST) argues that people increasingly prioritize emotionally meaningful goals when they perceive future time as more limited. Terror management theory (TMT) suggests that mortality salience (i.e., the awareness of one’s mortality) drives people to prioritize the goal of perpetuating own existence through affirming cultural worldview. Method In this study, participants (N = 438) were randomly assigned to six conditions that primed (a) limited future time, (b) mortality salience, (c) death reflection, (d) both limited future time and mortality salience, (e) both limited future time, and death reflection, or (f) none. Results Results showed that older adults allocated significantly more resources to emotionally close recipients who supported their cultural worldviews in conditions involving future time limitation and death reflection. They also allocated less resources to emotionally not close recipients who did not support their cultural worldviews in conditions involving future time limitation. Younger adults did not show these differences. Nor did mortality salience have any effect. Discussion These results suggest that future time perspective and death reflection shift age-related goals more than mortality salience.

Optimizing future well-being with artificial intelligence: self-organizing maps (SOMs) for the identification of islands of emotional stability

“…As people grow older and their time horizon dwindles, they start to value positive emotions more, especially when choosing social partners. Interestingly, a series of studies has shown that a similar effect is observed in people presented with the necessity to relocate or people primed with death reflection [ 70 – 72 ]. This suggests that psychological age, as defined in this article, should be malleable and represents one’s longevity optimism as well as one’s chronological age.…”

COVID-19 and perceiving finitude: Associations with future time perspective, death anxiety, and ideal life expectancy.

“…In contrast, an extended future time perspective would be related to the prioritization of instrumental and knowledge-related goals (Lang & Carstensen, 2002). Both theories hence assume that perceiving a finite future leads to shifting priorities and goals and has the potential to change an individual's course of action and life (Fung et al, 2020). It is thus crucial to understand whether perceptions of the finitude of life are affected by the pandemic.…”

The finitude of life—How mortality salience affects consumer behavior: A review

“…As the dual-process model reflects manipulations may also evoke death-related thoughts. We call for efforts to develop manipulations that reflect both TMT and SST which would help reveal their similarities and differences (Fung et al, 2019).…”

“…The term mortality salience has only appeared in studies based on TMT, though some recent research acknowledges the applicability of SST in this context, and one empirical effort seeks to compare the two theories (Fung et al, 2019; Huang et al, 2018). In support of our assertion that both theories should be considered as part of a broader MS concept, we first provide explanations of the central theories (TMT and SST) to predict which behaviors might arise when human mortality becomes salient.…”