2016
DOI: 10.3389/conf.fmars.2016.05.00103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrasting molluscan fauna collected with beam trawl and otter trawl in circalittoral and bathyal soft bottoms of the northern Alboran Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, some mollusc species present in the sampled areas were collected with a beam trawl but not with an otter trawl due to the different catchability of the distinct groups of molluscs. The latter may therefore provide valuable information on epibenthic molluscs and cephalopods, but for other classes (e.g., bivalves) it would be necessary to use sampling methods that target epifauna and infauna (Moya-Urbano et al, 2015). This could explain why multivariate analyses (CCA, MDS, PERMANOVA) using only bivalve data did not present acute differences between assemblages compared to those using cephalopod or even gastropod species, because the bivalve catchability with an otter trawl is much lower than that of cephalopods and some gastropods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, some mollusc species present in the sampled areas were collected with a beam trawl but not with an otter trawl due to the different catchability of the distinct groups of molluscs. The latter may therefore provide valuable information on epibenthic molluscs and cephalopods, but for other classes (e.g., bivalves) it would be necessary to use sampling methods that target epifauna and infauna (Moya-Urbano et al, 2015). This could explain why multivariate analyses (CCA, MDS, PERMANOVA) using only bivalve data did not present acute differences between assemblages compared to those using cephalopod or even gastropod species, because the bivalve catchability with an otter trawl is much lower than that of cephalopods and some gastropods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%