Abstract:Molluscan assemblages of circalittoral and bathyal soft bottoms of the northern Alboran Sea were studied using an experimental otter trawl. Samples of fauna were collected from 190 hauls during four MEDITS surveys carried out in spring between 2012 and 2015 at depths ranging from 30 to 800 m. Measurements of water column variables (temperature and salinity) and sediment samples were taken in the same locations where faunistic sampling was carried out. A total of 101 species grouped in 55 families were recorded… Show more
“…In general, only mega-molluscans (retained in mesh-size of 5 mm of a benthic sledge) had a peak number of species at the shallowest waters as observed in Mersin Bay (Mutlu and Ergev, 2008). This could be attributed to the higher heterogeneity of bottom types on the shallow waters since some molluscan species were related to specific sedimentary habitats (Gofas et al, 2011;Ciércoles et al, 2018). The shallow waters was ascribed "fine, well-sorted sand", SFBC and the deep zone "the Muddy-Detritic community", DE (Peres, 1982), being composed mainly of mud, sand and detritus dwelling species at depth greater than 100 m in Cretan shelf (Karakassis and Eleftheriou, 1998).…”
Section: Epifaunamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Abundance of the fish species (N≤100000 ind/km 2 ) was fluctuated with the seasons and seafloor depths in similarity to the molluscans, echinoderms and arthropods (N≤100000 ind/km 2 for each). The molluscs were the second most abundant faunal group in terms of density after the crustaceans, and other less represented faunal groups included echinoderms, annelids, and cnidarians in Alboran Sea (Ciércoles et al, 2018). The echinoderms were predominated abundantly in summer and winter, followed by mollusks and tunicates in the Catalan Sea (DeLaHoz et al, 2018).…”
“…Similar to the echinoderms, fish had the highest number in a depth range of 25-45 m. The number of arthropods was the highest at 45 m. Only molluscans had a peak number of species at the shallowest waters as observed in Mersin Bay (Mutlu and Ergev, 2008). This could be attributed to the higher heterogeneity of bottom types on the shelf since some mollusc species were related to specific sedimentary habitats (Gofas et al, 2011;Ciércoles et al, 2018).…”
During 2009During -2010 epifaunal materials were collected seasonally with a beam trawl from seven fixed stations in the infralittoral of Gulf of Izmir to study spatiotemporal distribution of megabenthic fauna and their ecology. A total 153 megafaunal species were identified belonging to nine phyla, comprised mostly of 54 molluscans, 43 chordates (mostly fish), 20 arthropods, and 18 echinoderms. Nine alien species were recorded. Four species (two fish species, one gastropod and one Asteroidea species) were constant species and 16 species were common species in the study area. Lesueurigobius friesii, Buglossidium luteum, Turritellinella tricarinata and Astropecten irregularis were the most frequently occurred, and Lesueurigobius friesii, Varicorbula gibba, Anomia ephippium, Turritellinella tricarinata and Dentalium sp were the most abundantly occurred species. Excluding the evenness index, faunistic characteristics tended to increase as a factor of depth. Seasonal density (abundance and biomass) was minimal in April and maximal in February, followed by November having 2-fold higher abundance than that inJuly. Faunal assemblages were correlated with regions of the gulf and habitat type. Buglossidium luteum overspread the entire gulf excluding the inner gulf. Varicorbula gibba and Fulvia fragilis, a pollution indicator predominated the inner gulf. Hydrographical parameters and depth were associated to dictate faunal assemblages with difference among the sectors and habitats.
“…In general, only mega-molluscans (retained in mesh-size of 5 mm of a benthic sledge) had a peak number of species at the shallowest waters as observed in Mersin Bay (Mutlu and Ergev, 2008). This could be attributed to the higher heterogeneity of bottom types on the shallow waters since some molluscan species were related to specific sedimentary habitats (Gofas et al, 2011;Ciércoles et al, 2018). The shallow waters was ascribed "fine, well-sorted sand", SFBC and the deep zone "the Muddy-Detritic community", DE (Peres, 1982), being composed mainly of mud, sand and detritus dwelling species at depth greater than 100 m in Cretan shelf (Karakassis and Eleftheriou, 1998).…”
Section: Epifaunamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Abundance of the fish species (N≤100000 ind/km 2 ) was fluctuated with the seasons and seafloor depths in similarity to the molluscans, echinoderms and arthropods (N≤100000 ind/km 2 for each). The molluscs were the second most abundant faunal group in terms of density after the crustaceans, and other less represented faunal groups included echinoderms, annelids, and cnidarians in Alboran Sea (Ciércoles et al, 2018). The echinoderms were predominated abundantly in summer and winter, followed by mollusks and tunicates in the Catalan Sea (DeLaHoz et al, 2018).…”
“…Similar to the echinoderms, fish had the highest number in a depth range of 25-45 m. The number of arthropods was the highest at 45 m. Only molluscans had a peak number of species at the shallowest waters as observed in Mersin Bay (Mutlu and Ergev, 2008). This could be attributed to the higher heterogeneity of bottom types on the shelf since some mollusc species were related to specific sedimentary habitats (Gofas et al, 2011;Ciércoles et al, 2018).…”
During 2009During -2010 epifaunal materials were collected seasonally with a beam trawl from seven fixed stations in the infralittoral of Gulf of Izmir to study spatiotemporal distribution of megabenthic fauna and their ecology. A total 153 megafaunal species were identified belonging to nine phyla, comprised mostly of 54 molluscans, 43 chordates (mostly fish), 20 arthropods, and 18 echinoderms. Nine alien species were recorded. Four species (two fish species, one gastropod and one Asteroidea species) were constant species and 16 species were common species in the study area. Lesueurigobius friesii, Buglossidium luteum, Turritellinella tricarinata and Astropecten irregularis were the most frequently occurred, and Lesueurigobius friesii, Varicorbula gibba, Anomia ephippium, Turritellinella tricarinata and Dentalium sp were the most abundantly occurred species. Excluding the evenness index, faunistic characteristics tended to increase as a factor of depth. Seasonal density (abundance and biomass) was minimal in April and maximal in February, followed by November having 2-fold higher abundance than that inJuly. Faunal assemblages were correlated with regions of the gulf and habitat type. Buglossidium luteum overspread the entire gulf excluding the inner gulf. Varicorbula gibba and Fulvia fragilis, a pollution indicator predominated the inner gulf. Hydrographical parameters and depth were associated to dictate faunal assemblages with difference among the sectors and habitats.
“…In the Alboran Sea, S. elegans is more abundant on the continental part of the shelf, while in the island area at these depths (30− 200 m) S. orbignyana is more common. At greater depths, only S. orbignyana is present (Ciércoles et al, 2018). In the Catalan Sea, S. elegans and S. orbignyana were generally the most abundant cuttlefish species, with the former most abundant at 30− 100 m and the latter at 200− 400 m. However, in winter, S. officinalis was more abundant than either of these species (DeLaHoz et al, 2018).…”
Section: Sepia Elegans and S Orbignyanamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The spatial distribution and abundance of a common cuttlefish were addressed in a series of survey-based studies. Results from surveys in the Alboran Sea and Catalan Sea (Ciércoles et al, 2018;DeLaHoz et al, 2018) and in the Mediterranean Sea in general (Quetglas et al, 2019) indicate that S. officinalis inhabits shallower and more inshore waters than S. elegans and S. orbignyana. In the Catalan Sea, S. officinalis was generally the least abundant cuttlefish species except in winter, when it was most abundant and its abundance reached a peak in the 30− 100 m depth range (DeLaHoz et al, 2018).…”
Section: Environmental Effects Distribution and Abundancementioning
With the depletion of many commercial fish stocks and an increasing demand for marine protein for human consumption, cephalopods have become more important as a fishery resource. In EU waters, cephalopod stocks are not routinely assessed and exploitation of these species by large-scale fisheries is largely unregulated. For sustainable exploitation, adequate assessment and scientifically-supported management strategies are needed. However, there is still a lack of data on stock status and inadequate knowledge of the life history and ecology of these species. The present review examined more than 200 scientific articles, on life history and ecology of European cephalopods, published since 2013. It describes recent contributions to knowledge in the context of previously identified research priorities, along with recent advances towards sustainable fishing and aquaculture. It also identifies outstanding knowledge gaps. While some priority areas, such as the development of the species identification guides and evaluation of climate change impacts on cephalopods, have seen significant advances, other challenges remain for the future. These include monitoring of the life history traits and fishery status for the main commercially exploited species in the area, implementation of improved species identification methods during scientific surveys and fisheries monitoring, development of tools to identify stock units, and the study of the environmental and anthropogenic impacts on the stocks of cephalopods inhabiting European waters.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.