2008
DOI: 10.1167/8.8.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast polarity, chromaticity, and stereoscopic depth modulate contextual interactions in vernier acuity

Abstract: Vernier alignment thresholds are strongly compromised when the vernier is embedded in an array of equal-length flanking lines. Here, we show that these contextual interactions can be diminished by giving the flanks the opposite contrast polarity, e.g., white flanks surrounding a black vernier. Similar results are obtained for red verniers and equiluminant green flanks and when vernier and flanks have different binocular disparity. Using special flank configurations, we can eliminate location uncertainty as an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
80
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
14
80
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, greater similarity between the target and distractors in terms of polarity led to more competition and impaired performance, similar to what has been found in studies of crowding and visual search (Baylis & Driver, 1992;Kooi et al, 1994;Sayim et al, 2008). The impairment by similarity has been suggested to result from grouping between the elements that may take place not only when the target is similar with the distractors, but also when these form a configuration that does not allow for target pop-out (Malania et al, 2007;Manassi et al, 2012).…”
Section: Psychological Researchsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, greater similarity between the target and distractors in terms of polarity led to more competition and impaired performance, similar to what has been found in studies of crowding and visual search (Baylis & Driver, 1992;Kooi et al, 1994;Sayim et al, 2008). The impairment by similarity has been suggested to result from grouping between the elements that may take place not only when the target is similar with the distractors, but also when these form a configuration that does not allow for target pop-out (Malania et al, 2007;Manassi et al, 2012).…”
Section: Psychological Researchsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…At least three factors have been found to contribute to crowding, namely feature similarity, target-distractor compatibility, and spatial proximity. First, distractors that are similar to the target by features such as color, orientation, and size lead to impaired discrimination performance and thus more crowding (Kooi, Toet, Tripathy, & Levi, 1994;Manassi, Sayim, & Herzog, 2012), possibly due to grouping between similar elements (Manassi et al, 2012;Saarela, Sayim, Westheimer, & Herzog, 2009;Sayim, Westheimer, & Herzog, 2008). Competition by feature similarity has also been found to impair performance in other tasks, such as visual search (Baylis & Driver, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A). Based on previous studies (Kooi et al, 1994;Manassi et al, 2012;Sayim et al, 2008), we expected flankers, which are identical in color to the vernier (same-color flankers), to crowd more strongly than different-color flankers. We presented the stimuli in a two-by-three factorial design with the factors Vernier Color (red or green) and Flankers (no flankers, same-color flankers, or different-color flankers).…”
Section: Apparatus and Stimulimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, a number of recent psychophysical findings have shown that high-level perceptual grouping can influence basic visual detection and discrimination performance in stimulus configurations that resemble those used in orientation-specific surround suppression experiments Joo et al 2012;Manassi et al 2012;Mareschal et al 2001;Sayim et al 2008). Thus we hypothesized that perceptual grouping would influence orientation-specific surround suppression such that it would occur only when the target and flankers were grouped into a single array.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%