2018
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/130/1/012006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast induced nephropathy in hypertensive patients after elective percutaneous coronary intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Проведенные исследования показывают негативное влияние таких факторов риска, как АГ, ИБС, на развитие КИ-ОПП вследствие внутриартериального введения КП [13,14]. Однако соответствующих данных относительно внутривенного введения КП в настоящее время недостаточно.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Проведенные исследования показывают негативное влияние таких факторов риска, как АГ, ИБС, на развитие КИ-ОПП вследствие внутриартериального введения КП [13,14]. Однако соответствующих данных относительно внутривенного введения КП в настоящее время недостаточно.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…In the group with door to wire crossing below 140 minutes, there were 1 incidents while in the group with door to wire crossing above 140 minutes there were 0.392 the incidence of CIN was more often in patients with hypertension but no difference in contrast between the two groups was found. 12 Based on STEMI's guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology, the expected door to wire crossing is less than 60 minutes at hospitals with Primary PCI facilities and less than 90 minutes for patients referred from other hospitals to the primary PCI center and at the latest the decision to perform primary PCI is less than 120 minutes. 13 In this study the cut-off point for door to wire crossing was 140 minutes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%