2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast enhanced cartilage imaging: Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with published data obtained from human and bovine cartilage samples ex vivo, indicating that T 1 depends on the macromolecular structure of cartilage [10,24]. This effect is considerably stronger at lower field strengths and could impact the quantification of tissue contrast agent concentrations in human cartilage in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This finding is consistent with published data obtained from human and bovine cartilage samples ex vivo, indicating that T 1 depends on the macromolecular structure of cartilage [10,24]. This effect is considerably stronger at lower field strengths and could impact the quantification of tissue contrast agent concentrations in human cartilage in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The measured r 1 of Mn-doped ZnS is much higher than the one of commercial Mn CAs such as Mn(II) dipyridoxyl diphosphate (Teslascan Ò , r 1 = 2.1 mM -1 s -1 at 1.5 T and 20°C) (Wiener et al 2007) and MnCl 2 (r 1 = 8 mM -1 s -1 at 0.47 T and 40°C) (Elizondo et al 1991) in aqueous solution. Furthermore, compared to the r 1 of CdTe/ Mn:ZnS with the Mn dopant concentration of 10 % (Jing et al 2013), MnZnS 1 in our study shows higher r 1 value of 20.34 mM -1 s -1 .…”
Section: Mri Studiesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Therefore, it has to be stated clearly that in future approaches comparable quantitative analyses may be possible without contrast injections. Further, a static state with complete equilibration after contrast agent injection cannot be reached in vivo and the GAG content of the deep cartilage layer may be overestimated [183185]. Further, dGEMRIC may not be specific to GAG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%