2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-017-4950-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contrast-associated acute kidney injury is a myth: Yes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This definition is problematic because in most cases, "exclusion of other nephrotoxic factors" is not feasible or reliable (2). Consequently, many cases of AKI that are coincident with but causally unrelated to intravenous contrast media administration have been incorrectly attributed as contrast induced, thereby overstating the risks of intravenous contrast media administration (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)15). The vast majority of studies on this topic have not included a control group of similar patients who were not exposed to contrast media, making it impossible to separate causal from coincident AKI (20).…”
Section: Nomenclature and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This definition is problematic because in most cases, "exclusion of other nephrotoxic factors" is not feasible or reliable (2). Consequently, many cases of AKI that are coincident with but causally unrelated to intravenous contrast media administration have been incorrectly attributed as contrast induced, thereby overstating the risks of intravenous contrast media administration (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)15). The vast majority of studies on this topic have not included a control group of similar patients who were not exposed to contrast media, making it impossible to separate causal from coincident AKI (20).…”
Section: Nomenclature and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such studies, the risk of CI-AKI has been estimated to be near 0% at eGFR greater than or equal to 45, 0%-2% at eGFR of 30-44, and 0%-17% at eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . These studies (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)10,11,13) are underpowered to establish risk in patients with severe kidney disease, differ in their conclusions about risk in patients with eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (estimated CI-AKI risk range, 0%-17%), and are observational in design (ie, only known confounders can be addressed). There are no randomized trials differentiating CA-AKI from CI-AKI in patients with eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 .…”
Section: Key Questions and Joint Nkf-acr Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients who re ceive contrast often have numerous other independent risk factors for AKI, either from their primary pathology or comorbidities, independent of contrast administration. As stated by Ehrmann et al 52) , this distinction between a causal and an associative relationship between CM and AKI is of great importance, because suboptimal care may result from excessive caution ("renalism"). For fear of ne phrotoxicity, patients may undergo unenhanced imaging which is less accurate than contrastenhanced imaging, resulting in negative impact on clinical decisions related to treatment.…”
Section: Ca-aki: Much Ado About Little?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is ongoing discussion about the impact of new contrast media on the size of the problem and the outcomes of prevention methods or even the existence of the problem, on the other side these conclusions were challenged as coming only from retrospective studies that does not take in account patients factors or indications for using contrast media in deferent cases with deferent baseline renal profile [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%