2020
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019192094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Intravenous Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients with Kidney Disease: Consensus Statements from the American College of Radiology and the National Kidney Foundation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
338
1
31

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 391 publications
(377 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(147 reference statements)
7
338
1
31
Order By: Relevance
“…We agree with the recent shift within radiology to distinguish between AKI that is contrast‐associated (CA‐AKI) and contrast‐induced (CI‐AKI). Reduced renal perfusion (whether in the context of haemodynamic instability or hypovolaemia) is a well‐established risk factor for postoperative AKI, but has not been demonstrated conclusively to be a specific risk factor for CI‐AKI within well controlled studies.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We agree with the recent shift within radiology to distinguish between AKI that is contrast‐associated (CA‐AKI) and contrast‐induced (CI‐AKI). Reduced renal perfusion (whether in the context of haemodynamic instability or hypovolaemia) is a well‐established risk factor for postoperative AKI, but has not been demonstrated conclusively to be a specific risk factor for CI‐AKI within well controlled studies.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…As postoperative AKI frequently involves pre‐renal factors, the common practice of periprocedural hydration in this patient population is likely appropriate. We acknowledge within our paper this may have ameliorated the true risk of postoperative AKI in our study, even if the evidence for prevention of CI‐AKI itself is mixed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, a recent consensus statement from the American College of Radiology and the ▶ National Kidney Foundation concludes that the risk of administering modern intravenous iodinated CM in patients with reduced kidney function has been overstated. Therefore, lowering the CM volume below a diagnostic threshold and a loss of diagnostic accuracy should be avoided [28]. Regarding objective and subjective image quality, our study found no statistically significant difference between the two protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Previous studies had already indicated these findings, with research groups suggesting that other factors including the underlying disease as the cause for AKI and nephropathy among patients receiving CM [20,21]. The latest consensus statement by the American College of Radiology also noted that risk of developing AKI after administering intravenous CM in renally impaired patients was overstated [22]. Given the different weighting that the risk of CM appears to have on AKI development depending on the procedure and route of administration, it is important to evaluate whether current practices regarding CM administration in TAVR are reasonable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%