2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8676.2006.tb00032.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contradictions of standard language in Europe: Implications for the study of practices and publics*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In each case, the community is aware and ready to acknowledge and respect the other. In western sociolinguistic terms, speakers are encountering and interacting with each other and creating 'publics' once a message starts to circulate (Gal 2006). Speakers participate in publics by such means, sometimes aligning themselves with what they repeat, thereby authorising it; at other times distancing themselves from public messages, thereby de-legitimating the texts and their erstwhile speakers.…”
Section: Vaa and Language Usementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In each case, the community is aware and ready to acknowledge and respect the other. In western sociolinguistic terms, speakers are encountering and interacting with each other and creating 'publics' once a message starts to circulate (Gal 2006). Speakers participate in publics by such means, sometimes aligning themselves with what they repeat, thereby authorising it; at other times distancing themselves from public messages, thereby de-legitimating the texts and their erstwhile speakers.…”
Section: Vaa and Language Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of social characteristics of language for developing peaceful negotiations in the wider global arena is a particularly challenging concept (Gal 2006).…”
Section: Vaa and Language Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this context, European nationalist grammarians began to see heterogeneity in language practices as an impediment to the creation of national subjects (Gal, 2006). It was, therefore, deemed necessary to create a codified, standardized language to cleanse the language of perceived impurities.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Monoglossic Language Ideologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competing and incommensurate language ideologies are clearly in effect across the EU at different scales. EU language policy has put new emphasis on multilingualism, putting forth the desirability of fluency in multiple languages-described by scholars as MULTISTANDARDISM-as a European ideal (Gal 2011;Moore 2011). But empirical research has shown this ideal to be constrained by a territorial focus on national standards, leading to the neglect of immigrant languages and nonstandard varieties (LINEE 2010;Rindler Schjerve & Vetter 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I conclude with a discussion of the contradictions that become evident in European language ideologies when one considers them from the viewpoint of these young minority speakers. The curious transformation of linguistic practices among young Carinthian Slovenes can be investigated by considering how language is regimented and indexicalized at different places within the nation-state (Silverstein 2003a;Gal 2005), in other words, by looking at which language ideologies are at play and where. Language ideologies are 'the ideas with which participants frame their understanding of linguistic varieties and the differences among them, and map those understandings onto people, events, and activities that are significant to them' (Irvine & Gal 2000:36).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%