2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2005.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contour tracking based on marginalized likelihood ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The state estimate is updated by maximizing the postulated likelihood for observing grayvalue transitions. A recently published variant studies a marginalized likelihood model which takes into account possible deviations of vehicle shapes from the modeled one, see Pece (2006).…”
Section: Discussion Of Related Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state estimate is updated by maximizing the postulated likelihood for observing grayvalue transitions. A recently published variant studies a marginalized likelihood model which takes into account possible deviations of vehicle shapes from the modeled one, see Pece (2006).…”
Section: Discussion Of Related Publicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore L(S str ) in (13) is the regularized log-likelihood of the working model (14). Similar objective functions in the form of likelihood ratios have been previous constructed by Pece [20] and references therein.…”
Section: The Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The objective is to find this template back in each image considered, (Ballard, 1981;Ferryman et al, 1995;Tan et al, 1998;Pece and Worrall, 2002;Hinz, 2003;Zhao and Nevatia, 2003;Dahlkamp et al, 2004;Pece, 2006;Ottlik and Nagel, 2008). The disadvantage of model-based methods is the high dependency on geometric details of the considered object, which in our case would require that vehicles should appear in the image sequence with many details and with clear boundaries.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%