2023
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contour‐guided deep learning based deformable image registration for dose monitoring during CBCT‐guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer

Abstract: To evaluate deep learning (DL)-based deformable image registration (DIR) for dose accumulation during radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients. Methods and Materials: Data including 341 CBCTs (209 daily, 132 weekly) and 23 planning CTs from 23 patients was retrospectively analyzed. Anatomical deformation during treatment was estimated using free-form deformation (FFD) method from Elastix and DL-based VoxelMorph approaches. The VoxelMorph method was investigated using anatomical scans (VMorph_Sc) or label image… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most deformable registration methods for prostate MRgRT rely on U‐Net, 13,14,16,17 but there are limited comparisons to other CNN architectures. We investigated three promising 3D architectures for deformable registration: a U‐Net, a mixed‐scale dense (MS‐D) network, and a Laplacian pyramid image registration network (LapIRN).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most deformable registration methods for prostate MRgRT rely on U‐Net, 13,14,16,17 but there are limited comparisons to other CNN architectures. We investigated three promising 3D architectures for deformable registration: a U‐Net, a mixed‐scale dense (MS‐D) network, and a Laplacian pyramid image registration network (LapIRN).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, which network architecture is optimal for contour propagation in online adaptive MRgRT needs to be clarified. Many existing registration approaches rely on encoder–decoder network architectures such as the U‐Net 13,14,16,17 . Other promising network architectures have yet to be thoroughly investigated for prostate MRgRT 18,19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%