2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuum damage interactions between tension and compression in osteonal bone

Mohammad J. Mirzaali,
Alexander Bürki,
Jakob Schwiedrzik
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…from bulk to ultrastructure) and originates most likely at the ultrastructural level (Li et al, 2013; Mirzaali et al, 2015; Nyman et al, 2009; Samuel et al, 2016). At the bulk tissue level, the stress-strain curve of bone in compression shows a strain softening behavior in the post-yield deformation and allows for larger plastic deformation and higher yield and failure strains compared with those in tension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…from bulk to ultrastructure) and originates most likely at the ultrastructural level (Li et al, 2013; Mirzaali et al, 2015; Nyman et al, 2009; Samuel et al, 2016). At the bulk tissue level, the stress-strain curve of bone in compression shows a strain softening behavior in the post-yield deformation and allows for larger plastic deformation and higher yield and failure strains compared with those in tension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-existing and pre-failure microdamage ( Figure 3) is not detectable using clinical imaging modalities but is deemed to be the most detrimental factor in defining bone's strength and toughness. 35 Microdamage accumulates due to isolated, non-physiological overloading events in a quasi-static mode or after suffering fatigue from a large number of physiological loading cycles 11,41 and decreases bone's stiffness, strength and toughness. 14,42 Microdamage can be differentiated into microcracks and diffuse damage which are smaller cracks on a lower length scale.…”
Section: Microdamagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,27,47,48 They appear at highly mineralised zones in bone tissue, between interstitial lamellae, along osteonal cement lines, at the boundaries of trabecular packages, at resorption cavities in trabecular bone, and, in case of sub-lamellar microcracking, along the canaliculi in cortical bone. 27,43,[47][48][49] Microdamage (Figure 3) is loading mode dependent 11 as it appears to be different in bone regions loaded primarily in tension compared to regions loaded in compression. 44,[50][51][52] In histology studies, tensile microdamage appears to consist mostly of diffuse cracks oriented normally to the loading axis while compressive microdamage is expressed as crosshatched microcracks.…”
Section: Microdamagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was noted that microdamage is loading mode dependent as it appears to be different in bone regions predominantly under tension compared to regions predominantly under compression (Jepsen & Davy, 1997;Reilly & Currey, 1999). Recent results furthermore suggest that microdamage accumulated under compression is not only different to tensile microdamage but has a much greater impact on the tensile strength than tensile microdamage has on the compressive strength (Mirzaali et al, 2015). In fact, tensile damage can hardly be 'seen' on the compressive side whereas compressive strength couples fully into the tensile mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%