The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.079-az0077.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous versus intermittent thermodilution cardiac output measurement during orthotopic liver transplantation

Abstract: SummaryWe evaluated intermittent and continuous thermodilution cardiac output data in 12 patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. Measurements were performed at 16 predefined time points between induction of anaesthesia and 3 h after reperfusion of the liver graft. Cardiac output measurements yielded 192 data pairs (intermittent cardiac output range: 1.8-18.9 l.min ¹1 , continuous cardiac output range: 3.3-20.0 l.min ¹1 ). During most of the procedure the correlation between intermittent and conti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An excellent bias (±0.0213 ± 0.59 l/min) was detected before and more than 45 min after CPB. In agreement with our findings in cardiac patients, the discrepancy between BCO and CCO occurred when rectal temperature and pulmonary artery blood temperature showed opposite slopes [15]. During this period, but not during the ensuing time points, the central blood temperature decreased while the rectal temperature increased, indicating thermal equilibration between central and cooler peripheral compartments.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An excellent bias (±0.0213 ± 0.59 l/min) was detected before and more than 45 min after CPB. In agreement with our findings in cardiac patients, the discrepancy between BCO and CCO occurred when rectal temperature and pulmonary artery blood temperature showed opposite slopes [15]. During this period, but not during the ensuing time points, the central blood temperature decreased while the rectal temperature increased, indicating thermal equilibration between central and cooler peripheral compartments.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our group evaluated BCO versus CCO in 30 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery with the use of a hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) technique [14]. This hypothesis was supported by a subsequent study in 12 patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation [15]. There was, however, a lack of agreement up to 45 min after CPB.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…CPATD CO measurements have been shown to correlate well with IB-PATD CO measurements under a wide range of CO in patients [62][63][64][65][66][67][68] (Table 1) and in animal models. 69,70 CPATD CO measurements were also compared with electromagnetometry and ultrasound using aortic flowprobes, representing most closely a "gold standard" for continuous determination of CO, in cardiac surgery patients, as well as in the presence of an LV assist device, allowing predetermination of aortic blood flow.…”
Section: Sources Of Measurement Error and Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…74 Although CPATD and IB-PATD rely on the same principle of thermodilution, extreme temperature variations can cause poor correlation between them. In patients recovering from hypothermia after cardiopulmonary bypass 75 or liver transplantation, 65 IB-PATD CO exceeded CPATD CO significantly until resolution of hypothermia. Indeed, IB-PATD CO may be less sensitive to thermal noise because the magnitude of the temperature change induced by the single cold saline bolus is much greater than the small heat signals induced with CPATD CO.…”
Section: Sources Of Measurement Error and Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Continuous cardiac output was collected every minute by a thermal catheter (Swan‐Ganz Baxter 744HF75, Deerfield, IL). At each collection time, data were obtained when catheter thermal noise disappeared,11 usually between 5 and 8 minutes after each change. In all determinations, we choose the lowest values for mean systemic blood pressure and the highest values for mean pulmonary blood pressure within 10 minutes after each point of the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%