1997
DOI: 10.1002/9781118490013.ch21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Quality Improvement in Statistical Agencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But as was pointed out by Morganstein and Marker [14], and previously by Deming [15], to improve quality one must measure process variables rather than just product (output) variables. In the last 10 years many statistical offices have coalesced around a common description of their processes.…”
Section: From Measuring Quality To Improving Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…But as was pointed out by Morganstein and Marker [14], and previously by Deming [15], to improve quality one must measure process variables rather than just product (output) variables. In the last 10 years many statistical offices have coalesced around a common description of their processes.…”
Section: From Measuring Quality To Improving Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lyberg [23] pointed out how useful CBMs can be. They are described in more detail in Morganstein and Marker [14].…”
Section: Organizational Leadership and Process Improvement Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the 1990s, many survey organizations, influenced by the Total Quality Management (TQM) movement (Groves and Lyberg 2010), started to work on improvement projects. The importance of using process data (later named paradata; see Couper and Lyberg 2005) to evaluate and control process quality was stressed by Morganstein and Marker (1997).…”
Section: Product Process and Organizational Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%