2018
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000002660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Noninvasive Arterial Pressure Monitoring Using the Vascular Unloading Technique (CNAP System) in Obese Patients During Laparoscopic Bariatric Operations

Abstract: In the setting of laparoscopic bariatric surgery, continuous noninvasive AP monitoring with the CNAP system showed good trending capabilities compared with continuous invasive AP measurements obtained with a radial arterial catheter. However, absolute CNAP- and arterial catheter-derived AP values were not interchangeable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The validity of non-invasive or semi-invasive CO measurements has been demonstrated in previous studies in different populations including normal-weight patient groups and surgical settings [11,[33][34][35]. In morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery, 4 prospective observational studies tested the performance of the vascular unloading technique for arterial blood pressure measurements [36][37][38][39]. While the one study did not demonstrate interchangeability between the Nexfin® system and Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff-derived blood pressure measurements in 33 patients [36], the other three studies could show clinically useful trend ability of the arterial pressure values [37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The validity of non-invasive or semi-invasive CO measurements has been demonstrated in previous studies in different populations including normal-weight patient groups and surgical settings [11,[33][34][35]. In morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery, 4 prospective observational studies tested the performance of the vascular unloading technique for arterial blood pressure measurements [36][37][38][39]. While the one study did not demonstrate interchangeability between the Nexfin® system and Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff-derived blood pressure measurements in 33 patients [36], the other three studies could show clinically useful trend ability of the arterial pressure values [37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery, 4 prospective observational studies tested the performance of the vascular unloading technique for arterial blood pressure measurements [36][37][38][39]. While the one study did not demonstrate interchangeability between the Nexfin® system and Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff-derived blood pressure measurements in 33 patients [36], the other three studies could show clinically useful trend ability of the arterial pressure values [37][38][39]. Thus far, evidence on non-or semi-invasive CI measurements in the perioperative setting of bariatric surgery is limited to one case series and one prospective observational study [10,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, the analysis includes blood pressure wave form documentation and provides derived parameters. The device has been validated in clinical trials indicating an excellent comparability with invasive measurements ( Smolle et al, 2015 ; Wagner et al, 2015 ; Rogge et al, 2017 ). In the course of preparations of the project, a specially trained CNAP ® instructor was invited from Austria for hands-on training sessions with our team of operators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such nonlongitudinal studies, it is often more of convenience than scientific interest that multiple measurements are obtained in the same subjects. For example, Rogge et al 15 studied the agreement between an invasive and a noninvasive blood pressure measurement technique in 29 patients undergoing bariatric operations, by analyzing a total of 6864 pairs of simultaneous invasive and noninvasive measurements. These repeated measurements clearly do not provide independent information, so the analysis adjusted for the nonindependence.…”
Section: Techniques For Analyzing Repeated Measures: General Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%