1979
DOI: 10.1097/00132586-197906000-00031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Monitoring of Skin Temperature using a Liquid-Crystal Thermometer during Anesthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, linear regression requires independence of observation; otherwise, the analysis is invalid. Similarly, Burgess et a1 (5) implied that skin temperature assessment functions as a trend indicator, but supporting data were not presented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, linear regression requires independence of observation; otherwise, the analysis is invalid. Similarly, Burgess et a1 (5) implied that skin temperature assessment functions as a trend indicator, but supporting data were not presented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Previous studies (5,6) have been presented to support liquid crystal adhesive strip monitoring of shell temperature during surgery as a trend indicator of core temperature. In six male patients undergoing therapeutic systemic hyperthermia, Lees et a1 (6) compared shell and core temperature recorded every 5 minutes for 2 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like all skin temperature measurements, they will poorly reflect core temperature when the skin is hypoperfused. Forehead skin temperature is typically lower than core temperatures by 2.2° C [2]. Changes in LCD forehead temperature lag behind changes in core temperature by more than 12 minutes [3].…”
Section: Temperature Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physicians, nurses, and hospital staff frequently report inaccurate respiratory rates possibly due to their underestimating the importance of the measurement [89]. Two studies in which physicians and staff were asked to assess tidal volume and minute ventilation indicate that tidal volume is (1) assessed poorly, (2) frequently overestimated, and (3) not reproducibly assessed on repeat observation [90,91]. In another study, ICU staff had a greater than 20% error more than one-third of the time when recorded respiratory rate was compared with objective tracings [92].…”
Section: Respiratory Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%