2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous hemoglobin monitoring in pediatric trauma patients with solid organ injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In pediatric intensive care unit patients, the Masimo Pronto SpHb Monitor provided adequate agreement between the nHgb and iHgb values for Hgb, but the authors cautioned that other clinical indicators need to be utilized to determine whether an iHgb draw is needed and that nHgb should not be used as the primary indicator for transfusion decisions 8. In contrast to our results and the pediatric intensive care unit study, a study conducted in pediatric trauma patients with solid organ injury noted only slight differences between iHgb and nHgb (Masimo Radical-7 continuous Hgb monitor results, but no differences were great enough to result in the change of clinical management 12. Researchers caution that nHgb may be used as an initial screening tool to determine whether iHgb needs to be conducted but should not replace iHgb monitoring should other clinical factors indicate the need for transfusion 8,12.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In pediatric intensive care unit patients, the Masimo Pronto SpHb Monitor provided adequate agreement between the nHgb and iHgb values for Hgb, but the authors cautioned that other clinical indicators need to be utilized to determine whether an iHgb draw is needed and that nHgb should not be used as the primary indicator for transfusion decisions 8. In contrast to our results and the pediatric intensive care unit study, a study conducted in pediatric trauma patients with solid organ injury noted only slight differences between iHgb and nHgb (Masimo Radical-7 continuous Hgb monitor results, but no differences were great enough to result in the change of clinical management 12. Researchers caution that nHgb may be used as an initial screening tool to determine whether iHgb needs to be conducted but should not replace iHgb monitoring should other clinical factors indicate the need for transfusion 8,12.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…11,12 In addition, these prior studies have shown that nHgb monitoring was more efficient, less expensive, and preferred by patients compared with invasive hemoglobin (iHgb) monitoring. 11,12 However, although an nHgb monitor has been developed for children, to our knowledge, it has not yet been validated for use in children for routine postoperative Hgb assessment. 8 If validated, nHgb monitoring could decrease anxiety, fear, and discomfort in hospitalized children who may have already been in distress due to postoperative pain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…INVOS ® (Somanetics Corp., Troy, MI, USA) was developed for measuring regional brain oxygen saturation through the use of 2 light-emitting diodes [13], and IN-VOS ® has also been widely used to obtain tissue oxygen saturation in areas other than the brain and peripheral microcircular reactivity measurements using VOT [1,2,14]. O3 TM (Massimo Corp., Irvine, CA, USA) is a recently developed NIRS method that uses 4 wavelengths, and only a few studies have used this device to measure cerebral oxygen saturation [15] or StO 2 [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continuous non-invasive measurement of Hb concentration can be performed with a pulse co-oximeter. This method was tested in different clinical scenarios: emergency room [ 9 ], complex spine surgery [ 10 ], major abdominal and pelvic surgery [ 11 ], liver transplantation [ 12 ], trauma [ 13 ], neurosurgery [ 14 ], cardiopulmonary bypass [ 15 ], and pediatrics [ 16 ]. To our knowledge, there was only one study performed on ICU patients, comparing continuous pulse co-oximetry to three different invasive methods [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%