Abstract:Hospital-acquired anemia is common in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU). A major source of iatrogenic blood loss in the ICU is the withdrawal of blood for laboratory testing. The aim of our study was to analyze the feasibility and accuracy of non-invasive spot-check pulse co-oximetry (SpHb), and a reduced-volume blood gas analysis (ABG Hb) for the determination of Hb concentration in critically ill patients. Comparisons between Hb determined with test devices and the gold standard—complete… Show more
“…Non-invasive spectrophotometric hemoglobin measurement was only readable 151 of the 156 patients included in this study, because of the arrhythmia and low PI effe (failure rate of 3.20%). This failure percentage was similar to the 2% reported by Czem et al in their cohort study (2022) and the 5% in Frasca et al's prospective study (201 Both studies retrieved data from patients prior to surgery, as in our current study [28,2 Hornedo-González et al also reported no SpHb readings in 10 of the 122 patients in th study [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This failure percentage was similar to the 2% reported by Czempik et al in their cohort study (2022) and the 5% in Frasca et al's prospective study (2011). Both studies retrieved data from patients prior to surgery, as in our current study [28,29]. Hornedo-González et al also reported no SpHb readings in 10 of the 122 patients in their study [30].…”
Preoperative assessment of hemoglobin concentration in blood is important to diagnose anemia. The primary aim of this prospective diagnostic test accuracy study was to monitor non-invasive spectrophotometric hemoglobin (SpHb, g/dL) concentrations among adults prior to elective surgery and to investigate the correlation and agreement of SpHb with laboratory hemoglobin (Hb, g/dl). A secondary aim was to identify the anemia cut-off values for SpHb based on the World Health Organization (WHO) definitions for anemia. This study included 151 consecutive patients (age ≥ 18 year) presenting for preoperative evaluation prior to scheduled elective general or orthopedic surgery. Results identified the mean ± SD of SpHb at 11.43 ± 2.01 g/dL, which underestimated the mean laboratory Hb (12.64 ± 2.29 g/dL, p < 0.001). A bias mean difference (SpHb–Hb) of −1.21 g/dL, with a SD of 1.76, was reported. This bias (SpHb–Hb) was inversely correlated with the mean Hb concentrations. A positive correlation existed between SpHb and Hb, with a good degree of reliability and a significant Intra Class Correlation (ICC). SpHb diagnosed anemia in 32.3% and 60.3% of males and females, respectively. The SpHb cut-off values to identify anemia were 11.3 and 10.2 g/dL for males and females, respectively, with a sensitivity of 83.3% for males and only 62.9% for females. The specificity for males and females were 81% and 91.3%, respectively. SpHb sensitivity allows for anemia diagnosis among males, but not females. However, the specificity allows SpHb to rule out anemia for both.
“…Non-invasive spectrophotometric hemoglobin measurement was only readable 151 of the 156 patients included in this study, because of the arrhythmia and low PI effe (failure rate of 3.20%). This failure percentage was similar to the 2% reported by Czem et al in their cohort study (2022) and the 5% in Frasca et al's prospective study (201 Both studies retrieved data from patients prior to surgery, as in our current study [28,2 Hornedo-González et al also reported no SpHb readings in 10 of the 122 patients in th study [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This failure percentage was similar to the 2% reported by Czempik et al in their cohort study (2022) and the 5% in Frasca et al's prospective study (2011). Both studies retrieved data from patients prior to surgery, as in our current study [28,29]. Hornedo-González et al also reported no SpHb readings in 10 of the 122 patients in their study [30].…”
Preoperative assessment of hemoglobin concentration in blood is important to diagnose anemia. The primary aim of this prospective diagnostic test accuracy study was to monitor non-invasive spectrophotometric hemoglobin (SpHb, g/dL) concentrations among adults prior to elective surgery and to investigate the correlation and agreement of SpHb with laboratory hemoglobin (Hb, g/dl). A secondary aim was to identify the anemia cut-off values for SpHb based on the World Health Organization (WHO) definitions for anemia. This study included 151 consecutive patients (age ≥ 18 year) presenting for preoperative evaluation prior to scheduled elective general or orthopedic surgery. Results identified the mean ± SD of SpHb at 11.43 ± 2.01 g/dL, which underestimated the mean laboratory Hb (12.64 ± 2.29 g/dL, p < 0.001). A bias mean difference (SpHb–Hb) of −1.21 g/dL, with a SD of 1.76, was reported. This bias (SpHb–Hb) was inversely correlated with the mean Hb concentrations. A positive correlation existed between SpHb and Hb, with a good degree of reliability and a significant Intra Class Correlation (ICC). SpHb diagnosed anemia in 32.3% and 60.3% of males and females, respectively. The SpHb cut-off values to identify anemia were 11.3 and 10.2 g/dL for males and females, respectively, with a sensitivity of 83.3% for males and only 62.9% for females. The specificity for males and females were 81% and 91.3%, respectively. SpHb sensitivity allows for anemia diagnosis among males, but not females. However, the specificity allows SpHb to rule out anemia for both.
“…It was possible to take non-invasive spectrophotometric hemoglobin measurements in 158 out of the 160 patients, and the recorded failure rate was only 1.25%. The failure rate was even higher in other studies conducted among patients with normal hemoglobin structure such as Czempik et al's cohort study (2022) (2%), Frasca et al's prospective study (2011) (5%), and Hornedo-González et al's study (8.19%) [34][35][36]. The current study is one of the few, if not the only one, to report the percentage of SpHb failure among patients with SCD.…”
Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) require repeated blood sampling for hemoglobin (Hb) concentration measurements. The primary aim of this study was to compare non-invasive spectrophotometric hemoglobin (SpHb, g/dL) measurements to those taken via an automated hematology analyzer (Hb, g/dL) in patients with SCD visiting outpatient clinics and to investigate the correlations and agreements between both measurement techniques. Secondarily, we aimed to identify the SpHb cut-off concentration for the diagnosis of anemia and to monitor the effects of the pleth variability index (PVI, %) and perfusion index (PI) on SpHb measurements. The results gained from the examination of one hundred and fifty-eight patients indicated that the SpHb measurements overestimated the lab Hb concentrations, with a mean (SpHb-Hb) bias of 0.82 g/dL (SD 1.29). The SpHb measurements were positively correlated with the Hb measurements (Kendall’s tau correlation (τ), n = 158, τ = 0.68, p < 0.001), with an intra-class correlation (ICC) of 0.67 and a 95% CI from 0.57 to 0.74 (p = 0.000). The SpHb cut-off concentration to diagnose anemia was 11.4 and 11.7 g/dL for males and females, respectively. SpHb sensitivity was low for males and females at 64.4% and 57.1%; however, the specificity was higher at 90.9% and 75%, with positive predictive values (PPVs) of 95.6 and 85.7, respectively. No correlation existed between SpHb measurements and the PVI (%) in contrast with a moderate correlation with the PI (r = 0.049, p = 0.54, and r = 0.36, p < 0.001, respectively). The mean PI was low at 2.52 ± 1.7. In conclusion, the SpHb measurements were consistently higher than the lab Hb concentrations, with a positive correlation. The sensitivity and precision of the SpHb measurements were lower than expected. However, the SpHb specificity and its positive predictive values (PPVs) indicated that it is less likely for a patient with a positive SpHb test result for anemia to be non-anemic. These results will allow SpHb measurement to play a role in excluding the presence of anemia. In light of the low PI values determined, the SpHb measurements were challenging to take and, thus, require further technological improvements.
“…Factors that may impact device bias include: the sex of patients studied, with improved performance in male patients [ 19 ]; sex differences in perfusion index [ 19 ] with lower perfusion index in women [ 20 ]; and poorer device performance when hemoglobin is outside of the optimal level of device calibration [ 20 ]. The larger-than-expected biases observed in our study may be due to the female population with many anemic patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study in anemic ICU patients concluded that non-invasive spot-check hemoglobin co-oximetry was not sufficiently accurate for clinical utility in their patient population [ 20 , 21 ]. Given the results of our study and the potential for clinical error as demonstrated on the hemoglobin error grid, we also conclude that SpHb is not sufficiently accurate for detecting anemia in postpartum patients.…”
Background
Spot-check hemoglobin co-oximetry analyzers measure hemoglobin transcutaneously and offer the benefit of a hemoglobin measurement without phlebotomy. The objective of this study was to determine the validity of non-invasive spot-check hemoglobin co-oximetry testing for the detection of postpartum anemia (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL).
Methods
Five hundred eighty-four women aged 18 and over were recruited on postpartum day one following a singleton delivery. Two non-invasive spot-check hemoglobin co-oximetry monitors, Masimo Pronto Pulse CO-Oximeter (Pronto) and Masimo Rad-67 Pulse CO-Oximeter (Rad-67), were evaluated and compared to the postpartum phlebotomy hemoglobin value.
Results
Of 584 participants, 31% (181) had postpartum anemia by phlebotomy hemoglobin measurement. Bland–Altman plots determined a bias of + 2.4 (± 1.2) g/dL with the Pronto and + 2.2 (± 1.1) g/dL with the Rad-67. Low sensitivity was observed: 15% for the Pronto and 16% for the Rad-67. Adjusting for the fixed bias, the Pronto demonstrated a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 84%, while the Rad-67 demonstrated a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 88%.
Conclusion
A consistent overestimation of hemoglobin by the non-invasive spot-check hemoglobin co-oximetry monitors compared to phlebotomy hemoglobin result was observed. Even after adjusting for the fixed bias, the sensitivity for detecting postpartum anemia was low. Detection of postpartum anemia should not be based on these devices alone.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.