2007
DOI: 10.1177/112067210701700103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous Full-Time Occlusion of the Sound Eye Vs Full-Time Occlusion of the Sound Eye Periodically Alternating with Occlusion of the Amblyopic Eye in Treatment of Amblyopia: A Prospective Randomized Study

Abstract: It can be concluded that in clinically monitored parameters both treatment modalities were equally effective without any statistical or clinical significance in the observed groups of patients. However, events like the ""trade-off"" effect, occurrence of occlusion amblyopia, or prolongation of PVEP latency of the sound eye indicate that full-time continuous occlusion possibly presents a more effective form of treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, patients with mild to moderate amblyopia are prescribed complete occlusion for 2-6 waking hours per day, over several months to more than a year (Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group 2003a,b; Repka et al 2003;Stewart et al 2004Stewart et al , 2006. Patients with moderate to severe amblyopia are often prescribed 6-10 h or more than a day (Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group 2003a,b), and some clinicians recommend more aggressive full-time occlusion for severe amblyopia (Dorey et al 2001;Bhola et al 2006;Stankovic & Milenkovic 2007). As reported in a recent large-scale clinical study of children (3-8 years of age), the dose-response rate for occlusion is approximately 0.1 log unit (1 chart line) per 120 h of occlusion, and the treatment efficacy is 3-4 logMAR lines (Stewart et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, patients with mild to moderate amblyopia are prescribed complete occlusion for 2-6 waking hours per day, over several months to more than a year (Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group 2003a,b; Repka et al 2003;Stewart et al 2004Stewart et al , 2006. Patients with moderate to severe amblyopia are often prescribed 6-10 h or more than a day (Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group 2003a,b), and some clinicians recommend more aggressive full-time occlusion for severe amblyopia (Dorey et al 2001;Bhola et al 2006;Stankovic & Milenkovic 2007). As reported in a recent large-scale clinical study of children (3-8 years of age), the dose-response rate for occlusion is approximately 0.1 log unit (1 chart line) per 120 h of occlusion, and the treatment efficacy is 3-4 logMAR lines (Stewart et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One RCT including five patients with SDA was found, but it had investigated the effectiveness of an educational program on the predictors of noncompliance to occlusion therapy (Loudon 2006). Five additional RCTs investigated occlusion therapy (Hertle 2007;Repka 2007;Stankovic 2007;Stewart 2007;Wallace 2006) but these included only strabismic or anisometropic amblyopia, or both. Thus, the search did not identify any new trials which met the inclusion criteria for the review.…”
Section: Results Of the Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%