2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2016.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous finite- and fixed-time high-order regulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the proof could be also derived by following the same line as the proof of Theorem 2 given in the recent work [31].…”
Section: A Definitions and Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Similarly, the proof could be also derived by following the same line as the proof of Theorem 2 given in the recent work [31].…”
Section: A Definitions and Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…*The current result on fixed-time stabilization of a nth-order integrator chain, in which some fixed-time leader-follower consensus protocols are based (see, eg, the works of Zuo et al 53 and Tian et al 54 ), was given in the work of Basin et al 56 However, such a controller, which is based on the homogeneity approach, presents two drawbacks for the design under time constraints. Firstly, the result only holds for functions |x| 1− 1 sign(x) + |x| 1+ 2 sign(x),with…”
Section: Robust Predefined-time Consensus Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the controller design problem for fixed‐time stability, the existing methodologies exhibit the following drawbacks. First, in methodologies like those proposed by Basin et al 32 and Tian et al, 28,29 which are based on the homogeneity property, 3 the UBST is unknown.Second, autonomous controllers derived based on Lyapunov analysis 1,16,26,34-36 may provide non‐conservative estimates of the UBST for the scalar case (see, eg, the work from Sanchez‐Torres et al 2 and Aldana‐López et al 34 ), but the estimate of the UBST becomes very conservative in high‐order systems (see, eg, section 5 in Zimenko et al 15 ). Third, in nonautonomous controllers based on time‐varying gains, 22,23,37 the origin is reached exactly at the desired time, but the time‐varying gain tends to infinity as the time approaches the desired convergence time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%