2005
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.27924-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuous culture – making a comeback?

Abstract: The heyday of continuous culture was in the 1960s, when its versatility and reproducibility were used to address fundamental problems in diverse microbiological fields such as biochemistry, ecology, genetics and physiology. The advent of molecular genetics in the 1970s and 1980s led to a decline in the popularity of continuous culture as a standard laboratory tool. The current trend of studying global proteomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics requires reproducible, reliable and biologically homogeneous data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
196
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
196
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantages of using chemostat cultures for physiological and metabolic studies have been widely recognized (Brauer et al, 2005;Hoskisson & Hobbs, 2005;Porro et al, 2003;Wu et al, 2006). Nevertheless, they have not yet found wide application in molecular and cell biology.…”
Section: Discussion Continuous Cultures: Subsiding Growth Rate Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advantages of using chemostat cultures for physiological and metabolic studies have been widely recognized (Brauer et al, 2005;Hoskisson & Hobbs, 2005;Porro et al, 2003;Wu et al, 2006). Nevertheless, they have not yet found wide application in molecular and cell biology.…”
Section: Discussion Continuous Cultures: Subsiding Growth Rate Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have studied the role of SFP1 by growing an sfp1D mutant and the isogenic reference strain in continuous cultures where the specific growth rate is equal to the dilution rate (D, expressed as h 21 ), which can be easily controlled (Hoskisson & Hobbs, 2005). Thus, chemostat cultivation allowed for a comparison of both strains at the same specific growth rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison to batch cultures, continuous cultures offer the advantage of generating highly reproducible, reliable, and homogeneous data -a crucial prerequisite for global transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic studies. Furthermore, secondary growth and stress responses of cells growing in a batch might obscure physiological differences (Hoskisson and Hobbs 2005). For our experiments we used the wild type strain ATCC 824 (COSMIC strain) and the group II intron retargeted mutant strain Cac-ctfA398s::CT originating from the COSMIC strain (Cooksley et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the disadvantages of these processes are the diffi culty in ensuring aseptic conditions and the possibility of degeneration or mutation of strains (27,28). Some of the well-described continuous processes using Y. lipolytica yeast include the production of lipids from molasses and glycerol-containing medium (29) and the production of citric acid using glycerol as a carbon source (1).…”
Section: Eff Ect Of C:n Ratio On the Growth And Erythritol Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%