Contingency, Staff, Anxious Pedagogy—and Love

Bessette, Lee Skallerup

doi:10.1215/15314200-7615502

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Focused on an agroforestry research institute in southwest China – the Institute for Farms and Forests (IFF) – this article builds its analysis primarily out of the perspectives of such staff 1. Illuminating the pressures and frustrations of IFF corporate services staff2 and graduate research assistants as they navigate the all‐too‐familiar bureaucratic travails of academic life, this article contributes to efforts to bring the experiences and expertise of non‐faculty staff into conversations about the present and future of universities and the sciences (Bessette 2019; 2020; Cohn 2021; Potter 2022; SOLR 2022).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Bureaucracy and distributed vulnerability at a Chinese research institute: beyond the faculty perspective on audit cultures

McLellan

2023

Royal Anthropological Inst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bureaucracy and audit are an increasingly pervasive fact of scientific and academic life. In this article, I examine this bureaucracy through the perspectives of non‐faculty staff at a Chinese research institute: the Institute for Farms and Forests (IFF). I build upon the lament of a staff member called Tao that inflexible bureaucracy is the consequence of civil servants’ determination to evade vulnerability. Bringing Tao and her colleagues’ analyses into conversation with the anthropology of gift exchange, I show how a literature that has long informed anthropological analyses of informal bureaucratic back doors provides an equally rich set of resources for understanding bureaucracy's formal, document‐mediated front door. Most especially, I draw upon the anthropology of gifts to illuminate the anxieties and vulnerabilities that shape and are shaped by bureaucratic practice. This approach can help us to understand Chinese bureaucracy in an era of increasing wariness towards informal social connections (guanxi). It can also help us to explore what might be at stake for the non‐faculty colleagues who – despite their indispensable roles – we seldom consider in conversations about academic audit cultures.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%