Contextualizing the American Industrial Strategy in the Neoliberal Era

Tassinari, Mattia

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76648-5_2

Cited by 11 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Other studies, however, have highlighted that governments may also consider certain degrees of market concentration as desirable, and therefore choose to encourage them. For example, restructuring of specific sectors has been favoured for strategic reasons (Di Tommaso and Tassinari, 2017;Tassinari, 2019), or to nurture infant industries consistently with the national developmental plans (Chang, 2002(Chang, , 2008. Our contribution shows that the Chinese government has the possibility to induce changes in the degree of market concentration, even only by stressing the relevance of certain sectors in its planning strategies.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Henceforth, whether public actors promote or hamper structural changes induced by M&As mostly depends on their political orientation on M&As. It also follows that choosing to impose strict (slack) antitrust regulations and enforcement works as a signal to economic actors to decrease (increase) actions aimed at changing current market structures (Di Tommaso and Tassinari, 2017;Tassinari, 2019). In the context of the Chinese economy, in particular, M&As have been used as a tool for restructuring SOEs and the state sectors by introducing mixed ownership to increase SOE efficiency and innovativeness (Zhang et al, 2020).…”

Section: Mergers and Acquisitions: Policies And Firm Behaviorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Investigating the linkages between industrial policies and M&A dynamics: Evidence from China

Barbieri

Huang

et al. 2021

China Economic Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Mergers and Acquisitions: Policies And Firm Behaviorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating the linkages between industrial policies and M&A dynamics: Evidence from China

Barbieri

Huang

et al. 2021

China Economic Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In fact, public policy risks responding to particular interests and opening up non-virtuous spaces for rent-seeking activities that can even degenerate into dynamics of corruption and clientelism (Barbieri et al., 2019; Di Tommaso et al., 2017; Tassinari et al., 2019). For this reason, great attention must be paid to the mechanisms for defining public intervention and for assessing the heterogeneity of the interests that are at stake (Barbieri et al., 2020; Di Tommaso and Schweitzer, 2013; Tassinari, 2019; Di Tommaso et al, 2020a, 2020b). Future studies in this field could be devoted to addressing and mitigating these crucial and complex issues.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutional and economic transition in Vietnam: Analysing the heterogeneity in firms’ perceptions of business environment constraints

Angelino

Tassinari

Barbieri

et al. 2020

Competition & Change

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vietnam has experienced a gradual process of institutional transition combined with rapid economic growth since the Doi Moi reform in 1986. In recent years, the government has recognized the need to implement reforms to foster the development of favourable business environment conditions. In this scenario, however, the government seems to assume a uniform demand for business environment reforms, ignoring possible divergences in the constraints faced by different actors of the system. The aim of this paper is to analyse the heterogeneity in firms’ perceptions of business environment constraints. Adopting discrete choice models on firm-level data and subjective assessments on business environment obstacles, we differentiate the nature and severity of firms’ obstacles according to different characteristics of the enterprises, including the firm size, territorial localization and levels of performance and competitiveness. The study is useful as an informative base for defining public interventions calibrated on the different categories and needs of Vietnamese enterprises.

show abstract

“…Semangat melindungi ekonomi -domestik yang digaungkan Trump terlebih dahulu mengemuka di era presiden Ronald Reagen. Terjadi debat akademik dan legislative yang cukup alot pada decade 1980-an di AS mengenai strategi Industrial Policy atau kebijakan industry nasional yang dikoordinasikan oleh dukungan pemerintah (Tassinari, 2019). Strategi yang sering disebut sebagai model Developmentalisme ini diimplementasikan secara sukses oleh negara-negara Asia Timur, terutama Jepang (Gilpin, 2001).…”

Section: Chairil Akbar Setiawan Garcia Krisnando Nathanael Gintinunclassified

Relasi Antara Politik Identitas Terhadap Proteksi Perdagangan dibawah Pemerintahan Donald Trump

Setiawan

Ginting

Ilmar

2020

JPI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Artikel ini berupaya untuk menjelaskan perubahan kebijakan luar negeri Amerika Serikat pada bidang ekonomi dibawah pemerintahan Donald Trump sejak 2017. Analisa akan dilandaskan pada relasi antara Politik Identitas dengan kebijakan Proteksionis yang ditempuh Trump. Orientasi Kebijakan ekonomi Trump menunjukan pergeseran cukup signifikan dibandingkan beberapa pemerintahan sebelumnya. Penulis akan menggunakan metode Kualitatif dengan model analisa Eksplanatoris. Pendekatan Proteksionisme menjadi platform utama Trump, yang termanifetasi pada penolakan atas kerangka kerjasama Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), renegosiasi kesepakatan ekonomi dengan Kanada dan Meksiko, hingga Perang Dagang terhadap Cina sejak 2018 lalu. Sentiment Nasionalisme, kewaspadaan pada pihak asing, atau reifikasi identitas Amerika Serikat dianggap sebagai unsur utama yang menyebabkan Trump berpaling dari dari rezim global Neoliberalisme. Penulis hendak menguji relasi antara Politik Identitas dengan Platform ekonomi-politik kebijakan Trump tersebut.. Kebangkitan isu Politik Identitas bukanlah penyebab utama yang melahirkan Proteksionisme. Trump hanya memanfaatkan kegagalan kebijakan neoliberal dari pemerintah-pemerintah sebelumnya dengan menggunakan retorika nasionalisme dan politik identitas.

show abstract

Contextualizing the American Industrial Strategy in the Neoliberal Era

Cited by 11 publications

References 22 publications

Investigating the linkages between industrial policies and M&A dynamics: Evidence from China

Investigating the linkages between industrial policies and M&A dynamics: Evidence from China

Institutional and economic transition in Vietnam: Analysing the heterogeneity in firms’ perceptions of business environment constraints

Relasi Antara Politik Identitas Terhadap Proteksi Perdagangan dibawah Pemerintahan Donald Trump

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About